Let it break

The emergence of generative AI has not broken assessment systems in higher education; it has exposed long-standing fractures. Overly complex tasks, excessive assessment demands and staff overload point to a system that has privileged compliance over human connection. This position paper acknowledges that brokenness but looks beyond it. Inspired by the Japanese art of Kintsugi, where cracks are repaired with gold, we ask: what if these fractures are openings for stronger, more relational practices to emerge? Adopting an autoethnographic lens, we draw on our experiences in curriculum design, academic leadership and learning support during a period of rapid change. We argue that trust is foundational in assessment design, enacted through dialogue, feedback, collaboration, and willingness to take risks. While the system may be under strain, the people are not broken. Designing with trust enables the reimagination of integrity. The future of assessment lies in transformation – built differently and built together.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASCILITE Publications
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65106/apubs.2025.2693
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Let it break

Michelle Pedlow, Rebecca Scriven, Justine Maldon
ASCILITE Publications
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Let it break

Michelle Pedlow, Rebecca Scriven, Justine Maldon
article en

Abstract

The emergence of generative AI has not broken assessment systems in higher education; it has exposed long-standing fractures. Overly complex tasks, excessive assessment demands and staff overload point to a system that has privileged compliance over human connection. This position paper acknowledges that brokenness but looks beyond it. Inspired by the Japanese art of Kintsugi, where cracks are repaired with gold, we ask: what if these fractures are openings for stronger, more relational practices to emerge? Adopting an autoethnographic lens, we draw on our experiences in curriculum design, academic leadership and learning support during a period of rapid change. We argue that trust is foundational in assessment design, enacted through dialogue, feedback, collaboration, and willingness to take risks. While the system may be under strain, the people are not broken. Designing with trust enables the reimagination of integrity. The future of assessment lies in transformation – built differently and built together.

ASCILITE Publications
Edith Cowan University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Let it break — Michelle Pedlow, Rebecca Scriven, et al. · ASCILITE Publications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS