Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revisions to total knee arthroplasty
In this large series of 235 revisions of UKA to TKA, the five-year survival of the TKAs free of re-revision was good. Our data suggest that the implant survival and clinical outcomes were inferior to primary TKA. Tibial component aseptic loosening was the most common reason for re-revision.
Authors
- Andrew D. Pumford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7413-9708)
- Cameron K. Ledford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0193-983X)
- Rafael J. Sierra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8513-1477)
- Charles Patrick Hannon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1579-4953)
- Matthew P. Abdel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-1724)
- Nicholas A. Bedard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3151-877X)
- Harold I. Salmons (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4124-9657)
Institutions
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Bone & Joint Journal
- Published
- 2025-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.107b12.bjj-2025-0184.r2
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.01