Evaluation Model and Comparative Analysis of Low Frequency Magnetic Field Exposure

This paper sets up a common model for electromagnetic field calculations in low frequency bands, and describes the comparative results of calculations conducted using multiple simulation tools. The human body models used for the calculations include a simplified human phantom (IEC62233, 2005) and the TARO (NICT) model. Evaluations were carried out using commercial electromagnetic field analysis software and custom program codes, and the results were compared and discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEJ Transactions on Fundamentals and Materials
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejfms.145.389
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Model and Comparative Analysis of Low Frequency Magnetic Field Exposure

Takashi Hikage, Kensuke Sasaki, Takeo Shiina, Yukihisa Suzuki
IEEJ Transactions on Fundamentals and Materials
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
article

Evaluation Model and Comparative Analysis of Low Frequency Magnetic Field Exposure

Takashi Hikage, Kensuke Sasaki, Takeo Shiina, Yukihisa Suzuki
article en

Abstract

This paper sets up a common model for electromagnetic field calculations in low frequency bands, and describes the comparative results of calculations conducted using multiple simulation tools. The human body models used for the calculations include a simplified human phantom (IEC62233, 2005) and the TARO (NICT) model. Evaluations were carried out using commercial electromagnetic field analysis software and custom program codes, and the results were compared and discussed.

IEEJ Transactions on Fundamentals and MaterialsVol. 145(12)
Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP), National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.