“Nowhere else to go”: Slow abandonment and (en)closures of long‐term care in Los Angeles

Residential long-term care facilities, known in California as "board and care" homes, have been closing rapidly in the last decade. Proponents assert these provide vital forms of housing and care to the poor and must be saved, while critics contend they perpetuate the institutionalization of people with disabilities and should be abolished. Drawing on 18 months of fieldwork in Los Angeles, I demonstrate that board and cares offer residents much-needed shelter and sustenance while also trapping them in worsening conditions amid ongoing "slow abandonment" by the state. Residents are confined by neoliberal state policy and political-economic forces that leave them with "nowhere else to go," and articulate critiques of their predicament that far exceed reformist solutions intended to salvage this peculiar, struggling institution. Seen through the lens of slow abandonment, meaningfully addressing residents' concerns requires an abolitionist project of building life-affirming structures of support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Anthropology Quarterly
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.70044
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Nowhere else to go”: Slow abandonment and (en)closures of long‐term care in Los Angeles

Mira Hellmann
Medical Anthropology Quarterly
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

“Nowhere else to go”: Slow abandonment and (en)closures of long‐term care in Los Angeles

Mira Hellmann
article en

Abstract

Residential long-term care facilities, known in California as "board and care" homes, have been closing rapidly in the last decade. Proponents assert these provide vital forms of housing and care to the poor and must be saved, while critics contend they perpetuate the institutionalization of people with disabilities and should be abolished. Drawing on 18 months of fieldwork in Los Angeles, I demonstrate that board and cares offer residents much-needed shelter and sustenance while also trapping them in worsening conditions amid ongoing "slow abandonment" by the state. Residents are confined by neoliberal state policy and political-economic forces that leave them with "nowhere else to go," and articulate critiques of their predicament that far exceed reformist solutions intended to salvage this peculiar, struggling institution. Seen through the lens of slow abandonment, meaningfully addressing residents' concerns requires an abolitionist project of building life-affirming structures of support.

Medical Anthropology Quarterly
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
John Randolph and Dora Haynes Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.