Use of patient-reported outcome measures in everyday clinical practice in ophthalmology: results of a European multicountry survey

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) reflect patients' abilities, difficulties and perceptions, but their use in ophthalmic care in Europe is unclear. We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey among ophthalmologists in the UK, Germany and Switzerland to assess PROM use in routine care, their perceived value and implementation barriers. Only 31% of 112 respondents reported using PROMs, mostly in cataract care, with no differences across countries or clinical settings. Strikingly, perceived usefulness did not predict adoption. Reported barriers included staff and patient burden and uncertainty about instrument choice. To promote routine use of PROMs in ophthalmology, system-level integration and support are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2025-328798
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of patient-reported outcome measures in everyday clinical practice in ophthalmology: results of a European multicountry survey

Sophie-Christin Ernst, Matthias Becker, Gábor Márk Somfai, Pete R. Jones et al.
1 citations
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
1.35
article

Use of patient-reported outcome measures in everyday clinical practice in ophthalmology: results of a European multicountry survey

Sophie-Christin Ernst, Matthias Becker, Gábor Márk Somfai, Pete R. Jones, Jan Henrik Terheyden
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) reflect patients' abilities, difficulties and perceptions, but their use in ophthalmic care in Europe is unclear. We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey among ophthalmologists in the UK, Germany and Switzerland to assess PROM use in routine care, their perceived value and implementation barriers. Only 31% of 112 respondents reported using PROMs, mostly in cataract care, with no differences across countries or clinical settings. Strikingly, perceived usefulness did not predict adoption. Reported barriers included staff and patient burden and uncertainty about instrument choice. To promote routine use of PROMs in ophthalmology, system-level integration and support are needed.

British Journal of Ophthalmology
University of Bonn (DE), St George's, University of London (GB), City, University of London (GB), Heidelberg University (DE), Triemli Hospital (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Use of patient-reported outcome measures in everyday clinical practice in ophthalmology: results of a European multicountry survey — Sophie-Christin Ernst, Matthias Becker, et al. · British Journal of Ophthalmology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS