Not Magic but Manageable: Generative <scp>AI</scp> and Instructional Decision‐Making in Structured Reading Intervention

ABSTRACT Planning reading interventions often calls for working within a research‐aligned program while tailoring instruction for student needs. We explored how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can support educators in reading intervention planning by examining how two novice teachers in a university‐based intervention program used GenAI tools to generate materials, customize texts, and refine lessons. Using the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework and a sociocognitive lens, we examined how teachers' use of GenAI evolved from basic prompting to strategic pedagogical reasoning. Planning became a space for professional learning, where tutors honed content and pedagogical understanding, refined decision‐making, and grew more confident in instructional adaptation. When embedded in collaborative systems, GenAI use surfaced instructional judgment and supported responsive adaptation, though it did not replace the need for human oversight. We offer implications for teacher educators, interventionists, and school leaders seeking to integrate GenAI in ways that strengthen pedagogical growth and instructional responsiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Reading Teacher
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.70036
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not Magic but Manageable: Generative AI and Instructional Decision‐Making in Structured Reading Intervention

Dennis S. Davis, Amy Walter
The Reading Teacher
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Not Magic but Manageable: Generative AI and Instructional Decision‐Making in Structured Reading Intervention

Dennis S. Davis, Amy Walter
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Planning reading interventions often calls for working within a research‐aligned program while tailoring instruction for student needs. We explored how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can support educators in reading intervention planning by examining how two novice teachers in a university‐based intervention program used GenAI tools to generate materials, customize texts, and refine lessons. Using the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework and a sociocognitive lens, we examined how teachers' use of GenAI evolved from basic prompting to strategic pedagogical reasoning. Planning became a space for professional learning, where tutors honed content and pedagogical understanding, refined decision‐making, and grew more confident in instructional adaptation. When embedded in collaborative systems, GenAI use surfaced instructional judgment and supported responsive adaptation, though it did not replace the need for human oversight. We offer implications for teacher educators, interventionists, and school leaders seeking to integrate GenAI in ways that strengthen pedagogical growth and instructional responsiveness.

The Reading TeacherVol. 79(4)
North Carolina State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.