Structural Mutations Set an Equilibrium Noncoding Genome Fraction

The evolution of noncoding genome size remains poorly understood. While part of noncoding DNA arguably plays a regulatory role, a significant portion does not appear to have a detectable phenotypic effect. The abundance of nonfunctional DNA in genomes, observed across the Tree of Life, challenges purely adaptationist explanations. Several nonadaptive theories have been proposed to explain its presence and identify its determinants, emphasizing either the mutational processes or the mutational hazard entailed by noncoding and nonfunctional DNA. However, those theories have not yet been integrated into a common framework, and the exact nature of the mutational hazard is not yet fully understood. In this work, we introduce a simple mathematical model of genome size evolution. Our model shows that the noncoding fraction of the genome is shaped by two fundamental forces: (i) inherent biases in mutational neutrality-adding base pairs being more likely to be neutral than removing some and (ii) robustness selection arising from the mere existence of structural mutations-larger genomes being more prone to double-strand breaks that generate such mutations, thereby imposing a second-order selection on robustness. Together, these forces establish an equilibrium noncoding fraction that depends solely on mutation biases and the product of population size and mutation rate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf315
Primary Topic
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural Mutations Set an Equilibrium Noncoding Genome Fraction

Olivier Mazet, Guillaume Beslon, Paul Banse, Juliette Luiselli et al.
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
article

Structural Mutations Set an Equilibrium Noncoding Genome Fraction

Olivier Mazet, Guillaume Beslon, Paul Banse, Juliette Luiselli, Nicolas Lartillot
article en

Abstract

The evolution of noncoding genome size remains poorly understood. While part of noncoding DNA arguably plays a regulatory role, a significant portion does not appear to have a detectable phenotypic effect. The abundance of nonfunctional DNA in genomes, observed across the Tree of Life, challenges purely adaptationist explanations. Several nonadaptive theories have been proposed to explain its presence and identify its determinants, emphasizing either the mutational processes or the mutational hazard entailed by noncoding and nonfunctional DNA. However, those theories have not yet been integrated into a common framework, and the exact nature of the mutational hazard is not yet fully understood. In this work, we introduce a simple mathematical model of genome size evolution. Our model shows that the noncoding fraction of the genome is shaped by two fundamental forces: (i) inherent biases in mutational neutrality-adding base pairs being more likely to be neutral than removing some and (ii) robustness selection arising from the mere existence of structural mutations-larger genomes being more prone to double-strand breaks that generate such mutations, thereby imposing a second-order selection on robustness. Together, these forces establish an equilibrium noncoding fraction that depends solely on mutation biases and the product of population size and mutation rate.

Molecular Biology and EvolutionVol. 42(12)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Bonn (DE), Lyon College (US), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Toulouse (FR), Toulouse Mathematics Institute (FR), Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive (FR), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (FR), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.