Handedness and Working Memory: Exploring Modality-Specific Effects

Working memory (WM) distinctions between right- and left-handers show inconsistent results in visual and verbal modalities. However, the tactual modality has not yet been assessed. The aim of the current study was to compare right- and left-handers across the three modalities. Thirty-two right handers and thirty left handers participants performed the Digit Span, Visuospatial Span, and Tactual Span tasks, encompassing forward and backward recalls. Results showed no difference between left- and right-handers on overall WM ability, and Tactual Span scores were lower compared to the other tasks. Left-handers performed better on the forward Visuospatial Span but worse than right-handers on the backward Tactual Span. Findings indicate that hemispheric lateralization patterns associated with handedness yield modality-specific advantages, highlighting the importance of considering both modality and handedness in interpreting WM performance, with implications for refining neuropsychological assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf107
Primary Topic
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Handedness and Working Memory: Exploring Modality-Specific Effects

S. Spiegelman, Eyal Heled, Gaya Asher, H. Nataf et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
article

Handedness and Working Memory: Exploring Modality-Specific Effects

S. Spiegelman, Eyal Heled, Gaya Asher, H. Nataf, Avishai S Shimon, Matan Kenigsbuch, Shani Yossef
article en

Abstract

Working memory (WM) distinctions between right- and left-handers show inconsistent results in visual and verbal modalities. However, the tactual modality has not yet been assessed. The aim of the current study was to compare right- and left-handers across the three modalities. Thirty-two right handers and thirty left handers participants performed the Digit Span, Visuospatial Span, and Tactual Span tasks, encompassing forward and backward recalls. Results showed no difference between left- and right-handers on overall WM ability, and Tactual Span scores were lower compared to the other tasks. Left-handers performed better on the forward Visuospatial Span but worse than right-handers on the backward Tactual Span. Findings indicate that hemispheric lateralization patterns associated with handedness yield modality-specific advantages, highlighting the importance of considering both modality and handedness in interpreting WM performance, with implications for refining neuropsychological assessment.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 41(2)
Sheba Medical Center (IL), Ariel University (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Handedness and Working Memory: Exploring Modality-Specific Effects — S. Spiegelman, Eyal Heled, et al. · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS