Relationship Between Knowledge and Compliance With Safety Measures: Evidence From <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19

ABSTRACT Compliance with health safety protocols is important for protecting public health, particularly in agricultural sectors where disease outbreaks can disrupt production and market access. Despite its economic significance, we know little about what drives protocol compliance. We examine the relationship between individuals' objective and self‐assessed knowledge and their compliance with safety measures in the context of COVID‐19. We find that greater opposition to COVID‐19 safety protocols is associated with lower objective knowledge and inflated self‐assessed knowledge, indicating overconfidence. Addressing cognitive biases could make public health interventions more effective, with important implications for agricultural settings where resilience depends on consistent protocol adherence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70031
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship Between Knowledge and Compliance With Safety Measures: Evidence From COVID ‐19

Carola Grebitus, Lauren Chenarides, Nilufer Cetik
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
article

Relationship Between Knowledge and Compliance With Safety Measures: Evidence From COVID ‐19

Carola Grebitus, Lauren Chenarides, Nilufer Cetik
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Compliance with health safety protocols is important for protecting public health, particularly in agricultural sectors where disease outbreaks can disrupt production and market access. Despite its economic significance, we know little about what drives protocol compliance. We examine the relationship between individuals' objective and self‐assessed knowledge and their compliance with safety measures in the context of COVID‐19. We find that greater opposition to COVID‐19 safety protocols is associated with lower objective knowledge and inflated self‐assessed knowledge, indicating overconfidence. Addressing cognitive biases could make public health interventions more effective, with important implications for agricultural settings where resilience depends on consistent protocol adherence.

Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Middle East Studies Association of North America (US), Arizona State University (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relationship Between Knowledge and Compliance With Safety Measures: Evidence From <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19 — Carola Grebitus, Lauren Chenarides, et al. · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS