Perceptions and pathways: Linking biodiversity to health and well‐being in lower‐income contexts

Abstract The biodiversity loss and human health crises are deeply interconnected, but existing frameworks linking the two are largely derived from high‐income contexts, limiting their applicability to much of the world. While these frameworks have been valuable, this gap is especially critical in rapidly urbanising low‐ and middle‐income regions, where health inequalities and biodiversity loss converge. To address this gap, we conducted research in Accra, Ghana, exploring how urban biodiversity influences health and well‐being. Using photovoice, 36 participants documented their lived experiences of local biodiversity and their perceptions of its impact on their health and well‐being. The resulting data were coded both using emergent and a priori codes based on existing conceptual frameworks. We found that biodiversity interacts with multiple domains of health and well‐being through four pathways (‘reducing harm’, ‘building capacities’, ‘restoring capacities’ and ‘causing harm’) that align with existing framings. We also observed two additional pathways (‘spirituality’ and ‘livelihood support’), both of which may have greater prominence in lower income contexts. Incorporating these pathways into our understanding of how biodiversity influences health and well‐being contributes to a more inclusive framework that reflects the socio‐economic and cultural diversity of rapidly urbanising regions in low‐ and middle‐income regions. We present an adapted framework that integrates these pathways, offering a context‐sensitive model to guide future research. Such a framework is essential for informing policy and practice in a way that benefits a broader range of communities, and thus, potentially, better allows us to address health and biodiversity crises together. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70217
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions and pathways: Linking biodiversity to health and well‐being in lower‐income contexts

Martin Dallimer, Steven M. Sait, Jennifer Hodbod, Alister Browne et al.
People and Nature
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Perceptions and pathways: Linking biodiversity to health and well‐being in lower‐income contexts

Martin Dallimer, Steven M. Sait, Jennifer Hodbod, Alister Browne, Gerald A. B. Yiran
article en

Abstract

Abstract The biodiversity loss and human health crises are deeply interconnected, but existing frameworks linking the two are largely derived from high‐income contexts, limiting their applicability to much of the world. While these frameworks have been valuable, this gap is especially critical in rapidly urbanising low‐ and middle‐income regions, where health inequalities and biodiversity loss converge. To address this gap, we conducted research in Accra, Ghana, exploring how urban biodiversity influences health and well‐being. Using photovoice, 36 participants documented their lived experiences of local biodiversity and their perceptions of its impact on their health and well‐being. The resulting data were coded both using emergent and a priori codes based on existing conceptual frameworks. We found that biodiversity interacts with multiple domains of health and well‐being through four pathways (‘reducing harm’, ‘building capacities’, ‘restoring capacities’ and ‘causing harm’) that align with existing framings. We also observed two additional pathways (‘spirituality’ and ‘livelihood support’), both of which may have greater prominence in lower income contexts. Incorporating these pathways into our understanding of how biodiversity influences health and well‐being contributes to a more inclusive framework that reflects the socio‐economic and cultural diversity of rapidly urbanising regions in low‐ and middle‐income regions. We present an adapted framework that integrates these pathways, offering a context‐sensitive model to guide future research. Such a framework is essential for informing policy and practice in a way that benefits a broader range of communities, and thus, potentially, better allows us to address health and biodiversity crises together. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and NatureVol. 8(1)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Ghana (GH), Imperial College London (GB)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.