In Situ Validation of Small‐Scale Spatial Variability in Significant Wave Height Observations From SWOT

Abstract Ocean surface wave climates are shaped by both atmospheric forcing and underlying ocean conditions. Variability in open‐ocean wave heights subsequently reflects complex interactions occurring across a broad range of spatial and temporal scales. Many of the processes driving this variability take place at small spatial scales that have been previously poorly resolved by sparse altimetry observations and coarse global wave models. The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission offers a new opportunity to observe variability at these scales with unprecedented two‐dimensional measurements of significant wave height (SWH) from the Ka‐band radar interferometer (KaRIn). In this study, we evaluate the accuracy of SWOT's KaRIn SWH estimates at an open‐ocean calibration site off Central California by comparing them to in situ wave measurements from a closely spaced array of buoys. SWOT KaRIn SWH measurements are validated at the calibration site with high fidelity and perform consistently in additional comparison to a network of coastal wave buoys. The centered root‐mean‐square error ranges from 0.10 to 0.17 m across the various data sets and product versions, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.98. Additionally we show that SWOT is capable of accurately resolving gradients in wave conditions over short spatial scales (10–90 km), and the high resolution two‐dimensional KaRIn observations better represents spatial variability in SWH than either traditional altimetry or coarse‐grid operational numerical wave models run without currents. Overall, these findings validate SWOT's wide‐swath observations as a powerful tool for observing and understanding ocean surface wave conditions and their connection to broader ocean‐atmosphere dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth and Space Science
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ea004286
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Situ Validation of Small‐Scale Spatial Variability in Significant Wave Height Observations From SWOT

Allison Ho, Andy Wu, Bruce Haines, Scott Stalin et al.
1 citations
Earth and Space Science
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
1.79
article

In Situ Validation of Small‐Scale Spatial Variability in Significant Wave Height Observations From SWOT

Allison Ho, Andy Wu, Bruce Haines, Scott Stalin, Jinbo Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Ocean surface wave climates are shaped by both atmospheric forcing and underlying ocean conditions. Variability in open‐ocean wave heights subsequently reflects complex interactions occurring across a broad range of spatial and temporal scales. Many of the processes driving this variability take place at small spatial scales that have been previously poorly resolved by sparse altimetry observations and coarse global wave models. The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission offers a new opportunity to observe variability at these scales with unprecedented two‐dimensional measurements of significant wave height (SWH) from the Ka‐band radar interferometer (KaRIn). In this study, we evaluate the accuracy of SWOT's KaRIn SWH estimates at an open‐ocean calibration site off Central California by comparing them to in situ wave measurements from a closely spaced array of buoys. SWOT KaRIn SWH measurements are validated at the calibration site with high fidelity and perform consistently in additional comparison to a network of coastal wave buoys. The centered root‐mean‐square error ranges from 0.10 to 0.17 m across the various data sets and product versions, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.98. Additionally we show that SWOT is capable of accurately resolving gradients in wave conditions over short spatial scales (10–90 km), and the high resolution two‐dimensional KaRIn observations better represents spatial variability in SWH than either traditional altimetry or coarse‐grid operational numerical wave models run without currents. Overall, these findings validate SWOT's wide‐swath observations as a powerful tool for observing and understanding ocean surface wave conditions and their connection to broader ocean‐atmosphere dynamics.

Earth and Space ScienceVol. 12(12)
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (US), Texas A&M University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, California Institute of Technology, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.