Accompanying novice drivers from a distance – The views of parents and novice drivers following an initial experience

• Introduces a real-time “Zoom-like” remote accompaniment method for novice drivers. • Both parents and novice drivers found remote accompaniment highly useful. • Remote accompaniment reduces tension for novice drivers compared to conventional rides. • Parents perceive remote accompaniment as slightly less safe but still acceptable. • Remote accompaniment is likely to increase accompaniment drives. Novice drivers (NDs) face elevated crash risk, particularly during their first months of solo driving. Parental accompanying is a widely endorsed method for mitigating this risk. Yet, many parents struggle to allocate sufficient time for accompaniment, and NDs frequently report elevated tension when driving with their parents. To address these challenges, we introduce remote accompaniment − a “Zoom-like” technology that enables accompaniment from a distance in real time. This study examined parent and ND perspectives on: (1) remote accompaniment usefulness, safety, and tension; (2) comparisons with conventional (in-person) accompaniment; and (3) the potential increase of accompanied driving utilizing the remote accompaniment. We invited 41 parent–ND pairs to experience both conventional and remote accompaniment drives. Following these experiences, participants completed self-report measures assessing perceived usefulness, safety, and attitudes toward each accompaniment method. Parents and NDs rated conventional and remote accompaniment as useful, with mean scores approximating 4 on a 5-point scale. Parents rated remote accompaniment as less safe than conventional accompaniment, though the mean safety rating remained above the scale’s neutral midpoint. In contrast, NDs perceived both methods as equally safe. Concerning tension, parents and NDs indicated minimal tension during both accompaniment methods. Importantly, both parents and NDs indicated their intent to increase accompanied driving using the remote system. In conclusion, remote accompaniment may present a promising approach for accompanied driving, and both parents and NDs find it useful and ready to adopt it in practice. However, successful implementation will need to address parents’ safety concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.103455
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accompanying novice drivers from a distance – The views of parents and novice drivers following an initial experience

Oren Musicant, Anat Goldstein, Nicole Ben-Haim, Moran Mizrahi
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Accompanying novice drivers from a distance – The views of parents and novice drivers following an initial experience

Oren Musicant, Anat Goldstein, Nicole Ben-Haim, Moran Mizrahi
article en

Abstract

• Introduces a real-time “Zoom-like” remote accompaniment method for novice drivers. • Both parents and novice drivers found remote accompaniment highly useful. • Remote accompaniment reduces tension for novice drivers compared to conventional rides. • Parents perceive remote accompaniment as slightly less safe but still acceptable. • Remote accompaniment is likely to increase accompaniment drives. Novice drivers (NDs) face elevated crash risk, particularly during their first months of solo driving. Parental accompanying is a widely endorsed method for mitigating this risk. Yet, many parents struggle to allocate sufficient time for accompaniment, and NDs frequently report elevated tension when driving with their parents. To address these challenges, we introduce remote accompaniment − a “Zoom-like” technology that enables accompaniment from a distance in real time. This study examined parent and ND perspectives on: (1) remote accompaniment usefulness, safety, and tension; (2) comparisons with conventional (in-person) accompaniment; and (3) the potential increase of accompanied driving utilizing the remote accompaniment. We invited 41 parent–ND pairs to experience both conventional and remote accompaniment drives. Following these experiences, participants completed self-report measures assessing perceived usefulness, safety, and attitudes toward each accompaniment method. Parents and NDs rated conventional and remote accompaniment as useful, with mean scores approximating 4 on a 5-point scale. Parents rated remote accompaniment as less safe than conventional accompaniment, though the mean safety rating remained above the scale’s neutral midpoint. In contrast, NDs perceived both methods as equally safe. Concerning tension, parents and NDs indicated minimal tension during both accompaniment methods. Importantly, both parents and NDs indicated their intent to increase accompanied driving using the remote system. In conclusion, remote accompaniment may present a promising approach for accompanied driving, and both parents and NDs find it useful and ready to adopt it in practice. However, successful implementation will need to address parents’ safety concerns.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 117
Ariel University (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.