Cost-benefit analysis of interventions to protect care home residents in England against heat risks

We examine the cost-benefit of selected physical and behavioural interventions to reduce indoor temperatures and associated health risks in UK care homes during periods of hot weather typical of the projected future climate. Cases of heat-related mortality under selected temperature scenarios were modelled for three care home settings. Published temperature-mortality functions for care home residents of England and Wales were applied to life tables for care home populations. Building physics modelling was used to assess the effect of interventions on summer indoor temperatures and associated mortality risks. The monetised value of quality-adjusted life years gained was assessed in relation to the capital, energy and maintenance costs of each intervention over its lifespan under a range of assumptions. Sensitivity analyses were used to characterise model uncertainty. Under the assumption that those who die of heat have the life expectancy of an average care home resident, we found evidence for cost-effective interventions. The cost-effectiveness of interventions varied across care homes, depending on each building's specific characteristics. In a large, highly insulated care home with low thermal mass, increased thermal mass combined with window and door opening rules was the most cost-effective intervention; in a small care home with limited insulation and high thermal mass, active cooling in lounges using portable air-conditioners was most cost-effective; and in a medium sized care home with moderate insulation and thermal mass, shading combined with window and door opening rules was most cost-effective. Our results show that several interventions have the potential to be cost-effective in reducing heat-related risks to residents across a range of care home types. They also demonstrate that behavioural interventions, such as window and door opening, may be equally effective as physical interventions at reducing exposure to heat-related risks, provided they are fully adhered to.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Health
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/ae25c8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-benefit analysis of interventions to protect care home residents in England against heat risks

John Cairns, Eleni Oikonomou, Michael Davies, Anna Mavrogianni et al.
1 citations
Environmental Research Health
Climate Change and Health Impacts
1.20
article

Cost-benefit analysis of interventions to protect care home residents in England against heat risks

John Cairns, Eleni Oikonomou, Michael Davies, Anna Mavrogianni, Ai Milojevic, Giorgos Petrou, Rajat Gupta, Alastair Howard, Andrew Ibbetson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We examine the cost-benefit of selected physical and behavioural interventions to reduce indoor temperatures and associated health risks in UK care homes during periods of hot weather typical of the projected future climate. Cases of heat-related mortality under selected temperature scenarios were modelled for three care home settings. Published temperature-mortality functions for care home residents of England and Wales were applied to life tables for care home populations. Building physics modelling was used to assess the effect of interventions on summer indoor temperatures and associated mortality risks. The monetised value of quality-adjusted life years gained was assessed in relation to the capital, energy and maintenance costs of each intervention over its lifespan under a range of assumptions. Sensitivity analyses were used to characterise model uncertainty. Under the assumption that those who die of heat have the life expectancy of an average care home resident, we found evidence for cost-effective interventions. The cost-effectiveness of interventions varied across care homes, depending on each building's specific characteristics. In a large, highly insulated care home with low thermal mass, increased thermal mass combined with window and door opening rules was the most cost-effective intervention; in a small care home with limited insulation and high thermal mass, active cooling in lounges using portable air-conditioners was most cost-effective; and in a medium sized care home with moderate insulation and thermal mass, shading combined with window and door opening rules was most cost-effective. Our results show that several interventions have the potential to be cost-effective in reducing heat-related risks to residents across a range of care home types. They also demonstrate that behavioural interventions, such as window and door opening, may be equally effective as physical interventions at reducing exposure to heat-related risks, provided they are fully adhered to.

Environmental Research HealthVol. 3(4)
Oxford Brookes University (GB), University of London (GB), Energy Institute (GB), Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Faculty of Public Health (GB), University College London (GB)
Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.