A scoping review of explainable artificial intelligence in sports science

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly being applied in sports science to predict performance, assess injury risk, and support tactical decision-making. However, the opacity of many machine learning (ML) models has led to a growing interest in explainable AI (XAI) methods, which aim to make the decisions of "black box" algorithms more transparent and interpretable. The result of this is an increase in trust, facilitation of model validation, and enablement of more informed decision-making for practitioners and analysts. While XAI is well established in domains like healthcare or finance, its application in sports science remains fragmented and underexplored. This scoping review follows the PRISMA-Sc approach and systematically examines how XAI and interpretable ML techniques have been applied in the context of sports science. Between 2014 and June 2024, a total of 19 studies were identified through a multi-database search and analyzed in terms of sport type, ML model, XAI method, dependent variable, limitations, challenges and future research. The results reveal a clear dominance of SHapley Additive Explanations across multiple disciplines, while other tools such as Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping, Individual Conditional Expectation Plots, or domain-specific approaches are rarely used. Visual and rule-based explanation methods were largely absent. The findings highlight a lack of methodological diversity and limited validation of explanations with domain experts or practitioners. To increase real-world impact, future work should explore comparative evaluations of XAI techniques, domain-specific explanation frameworks, and user-centered approaches that align with the needs of coaches, athletes, and analysts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00709-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of explainable artificial intelligence in sports science

Stefan Kranzinger, Christina Halmich, Christina Kranzinger, Dominik Hofer
2 citations
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
4.96
article

A scoping review of explainable artificial intelligence in sports science

Stefan Kranzinger, Christina Halmich, Christina Kranzinger, Dominik Hofer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly being applied in sports science to predict performance, assess injury risk, and support tactical decision-making. However, the opacity of many machine learning (ML) models has led to a growing interest in explainable AI (XAI) methods, which aim to make the decisions of "black box" algorithms more transparent and interpretable. The result of this is an increase in trust, facilitation of model validation, and enablement of more informed decision-making for practitioners and analysts. While XAI is well established in domains like healthcare or finance, its application in sports science remains fragmented and underexplored. This scoping review follows the PRISMA-Sc approach and systematically examines how XAI and interpretable ML techniques have been applied in the context of sports science. Between 2014 and June 2024, a total of 19 studies were identified through a multi-database search and analyzed in terms of sport type, ML model, XAI method, dependent variable, limitations, challenges and future research. The results reveal a clear dominance of SHapley Additive Explanations across multiple disciplines, while other tools such as Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping, Individual Conditional Expectation Plots, or domain-specific approaches are rarely used. Visual and rule-based explanation methods were largely absent. The findings highlight a lack of methodological diversity and limited validation of explanations with domain experts or practitioners. To increase real-world impact, future work should explore comparative evaluations of XAI techniques, domain-specific explanation frameworks, and user-centered approaches that align with the needs of coaches, athletes, and analysts.

Discover Artificial IntelligenceVol. 6(1)
University of Salzburg (AT), Fachhochschule Salzburg (AT), Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Age Research (AT), Pädagogische Hochschule Salzburg (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.