Exposure of Supramid Stent – A Hornet’s Nest

Flow restriction is essential to prevent early postoperative hypotony with non-valved glaucoma drainage devices.[1] It is usually achieved with either tube ligation, an intraluminal stent suture or both. Ideally, this suture is tunnelled beneath the bulbar conjunctiva toward the inferior fornix, where it can be accessed and removed after 6 weeks if required, known as the ripcord technique. However, exposure of this stent in the immediate postoperative period could lead to serious complications such as endophthalmitis.[2,3] A 10-year-old child diagnosed with glaucoma following multiple vitreoretinal (VR) surgeries, underwent Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI) with Supramid (3-0 nylon multifilament suture) stenting. One month postoperative follow up of the child revealed exposed Supramid stent (Figure 1-black circle). Immediately, Supramid removal was done under strict aseptic precautions. It is crucial to place the Supramid stent in the subtenon space with meticulous conjunctival closure to prevent this complication.Figure 1: (A) Slit lamp image of the right eye showing AADI tube with exposure of the Supramid stent (black circle). AADI = Aurolab aqueous drainage implantFinancial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/tjosr.tjosr_107_25
Primary Topic
Retinal and Macular Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exposure of Supramid Stent – A Hornet’s Nest

Vijayalakshmi A Senthilkumar
TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research
Retinal and Macular Surgery
article

Exposure of Supramid Stent – A Hornet’s Nest

Vijayalakshmi A Senthilkumar
article en

Abstract

Flow restriction is essential to prevent early postoperative hypotony with non-valved glaucoma drainage devices.[1] It is usually achieved with either tube ligation, an intraluminal stent suture or both. Ideally, this suture is tunnelled beneath the bulbar conjunctiva toward the inferior fornix, where it can be accessed and removed after 6 weeks if required, known as the ripcord technique. However, exposure of this stent in the immediate postoperative period could lead to serious complications such as endophthalmitis.[2,3] A 10-year-old child diagnosed with glaucoma following multiple vitreoretinal (VR) surgeries, underwent Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI) with Supramid (3-0 nylon multifilament suture) stenting. One month postoperative follow up of the child revealed exposed Supramid stent (Figure 1-black circle). Immediately, Supramid removal was done under strict aseptic precautions. It is crucial to place the Supramid stent in the subtenon space with meticulous conjunctival closure to prevent this complication.Figure 1: (A) Slit lamp image of the right eye showing AADI tube with exposure of the Supramid stent (black circle). AADI = Aurolab aqueous drainage implantFinancial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and ResearchVol. 63(4)
Aravind Eye Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Retinal and Macular Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.