Do consumers prefer multidimensional or multiple single-issue sustainability labels? Evidence from rice markets in Germany and Singapore

Multidimensional labels have emerged as a potential solution to the proliferation of multi-labelling in the food industry, which often leads to consumer confusion and scepticism. This study examines the performance of the Sustainable Rice Platform (SRP) multidimensional label compared to single-issue labels (Organic, Fairtrade, and World Wildlife Fund) and origin attributes in the rice market. We assessed SRP's potential to replace or complement existing labelling systems using a discrete choice experiment with 507 German and 361 Singaporean rice consumers, measuring willingness to pay for rice with different label combinations. Results indicate that while SRP's familiarity and trust lagged most established single-issue labels in both markets, its performance varied by market context. In Singapore's unsaturated label market, SRP outperformed single-issue labels and origin, whereas in Germany's saturated market, familiar labels like Fairtrade, Organic or EU origin surpassed SRP. Partial substitution effects occurred when SRP was combined with Organic in both markets, but SRP cannot fully replace the Organic label. Complementary effects emerged when SRP was combined with trustworthy single-issue labels or favourable origin labels. Importantly, multi-labelling with Organic, Fairtrade and WWF labels outperformed the SRP label by almost double in Singapore and triple in Germany, suggesting consumers value multiple simple certifications over a single, complex multidimensional label. These findings contribute to existing literature on multidimensional and multi-labelling scheme effectiveness, revealing market-specific consumer preferences. The results have significant implications for sustainable labelling strategies in the rice industry and can guide policymakers and food companies in developing more effective sustainability communication approaches. • Multidimensional SRP label outperforms single-issue labels in Singapore's market. • In Germany, EU origin and familiar single-issue labels outrank SRP. • SRP partially substitutes Organic but cannot fully replace it in both markets. • Complementary effects observed when SRP combines with EU origin and trusted labels. • Multi-labelling boosts WTP 2× (Singapore), 3× (Germany) vs. SRP in 3-way interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105812
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do consumers prefer multidimensional or multiple single-issue sustainability labels? Evidence from rice markets in Germany and Singapore

Maureen Schulze, Leonard V. Coote, Ammar Abdul Aziz, Risti Permani et al.
1 citations
Food Quality and Preference
Organic Food and Agriculture
1.75
article

Do consumers prefer multidimensional or multiple single-issue sustainability labels? Evidence from rice markets in Germany and Singapore

Maureen Schulze, Leonard V. Coote, Ammar Abdul Aziz, Risti Permani, Julia Checco, Matty Demont, Yanti Nuraeni Muflikh, J. H. Mitchell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Multidimensional labels have emerged as a potential solution to the proliferation of multi-labelling in the food industry, which often leads to consumer confusion and scepticism. This study examines the performance of the Sustainable Rice Platform (SRP) multidimensional label compared to single-issue labels (Organic, Fairtrade, and World Wildlife Fund) and origin attributes in the rice market. We assessed SRP's potential to replace or complement existing labelling systems using a discrete choice experiment with 507 German and 361 Singaporean rice consumers, measuring willingness to pay for rice with different label combinations. Results indicate that while SRP's familiarity and trust lagged most established single-issue labels in both markets, its performance varied by market context. In Singapore's unsaturated label market, SRP outperformed single-issue labels and origin, whereas in Germany's saturated market, familiar labels like Fairtrade, Organic or EU origin surpassed SRP. Partial substitution effects occurred when SRP was combined with Organic in both markets, but SRP cannot fully replace the Organic label. Complementary effects emerged when SRP was combined with trustworthy single-issue labels or favourable origin labels. Importantly, multi-labelling with Organic, Fairtrade and WWF labels outperformed the SRP label by almost double in Singapore and triple in Germany, suggesting consumers value multiple simple certifications over a single, complex multidimensional label. These findings contribute to existing literature on multidimensional and multi-labelling scheme effectiveness, revealing market-specific consumer preferences. The results have significant implications for sustainable labelling strategies in the rice industry and can guide policymakers and food companies in developing more effective sustainability communication approaches. • Multidimensional SRP label outperforms single-issue labels in Singapore's market. • In Germany, EU origin and familiar single-issue labels outrank SRP. • SRP partially substitutes Organic but cannot fully replace it in both markets. • Complementary effects observed when SRP combines with EU origin and trusted labels. • Multi-labelling boosts WTP 2× (Singapore), 3× (Germany) vs. SRP in 3-way interaction.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 137
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), International Rice Research Institute (PH), The University of Queensland (AU), IPB University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Organic Food and Agriculture
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.