A multiple criteria framework for value-based assessment of health care services applied to a radiology case

Traditionally, value-based health care assessment initiatives have: (1) not explicitly evaluated value; (2) been complex (which limits reproducibility) and not admitted customization; and 4) not operationalized value in a way that addresses the concerns of the involved stakeholders. This research developed a four-step framework for value-based assessment of health care services that aims to overcome these limitations. The development of the framework was supported by a case study conducted in the radiology department of the second largest general hospital in Portugal and involved the participation of administrators, physicians, radiographers, and patients, and incorporates several Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis methods. A set of 160 indicators to assess the value of radiology departments was identified in the literature and synthesized into 7 value-assessment dimensions. The framework considers specific indicators for each stakeholder type and suggests customizable ways to determine the benefit of the service. Additionally, we determined the value of the radiology department (considering benefits perceived by stakeholders and direct clinical costs) and propose a dashboard to monitor its evolution. The developed management tool enables an explicit valuation of the department and uncovers service features that need to be improved. If its use is continued, it will report the evolution of the department. The framework can easily be adapted to other hospitals or departments or be used by researchers as a basis for the development of other models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13288-2
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multiple criteria framework for value-based assessment of health care services applied to a radiology case

Nazaré Rego, José Crispim, Ana Moreira
BMC Health Services Research
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

A multiple criteria framework for value-based assessment of health care services applied to a radiology case

Nazaré Rego, José Crispim, Ana Moreira
article en

Abstract

Traditionally, value-based health care assessment initiatives have: (1) not explicitly evaluated value; (2) been complex (which limits reproducibility) and not admitted customization; and 4) not operationalized value in a way that addresses the concerns of the involved stakeholders. This research developed a four-step framework for value-based assessment of health care services that aims to overcome these limitations. The development of the framework was supported by a case study conducted in the radiology department of the second largest general hospital in Portugal and involved the participation of administrators, physicians, radiographers, and patients, and incorporates several Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis methods. A set of 160 indicators to assess the value of radiology departments was identified in the literature and synthesized into 7 value-assessment dimensions. The framework considers specific indicators for each stakeholder type and suggests customizable ways to determine the benefit of the service. Additionally, we determined the value of the radiology department (considering benefits perceived by stakeholders and direct clinical costs) and propose a dashboard to monitor its evolution. The developed management tool enables an explicit valuation of the department and uncovers service features that need to be improved. If its use is continued, it will report the evolution of the department. The framework can easily be adapted to other hospitals or departments or be used by researchers as a basis for the development of other models.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 26(1)
Hospital de São João (PT), University of Minho (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.