Translation and psychometric evaluation of a self-regulated learning questionnaire for blended learning among Iranian students

Background & Objective: The rapid advancement of the Internet and technology has enabled the widespread adoption of blended learning in medical education.However, there is no validated Persian scale to measure self-regulated learning in blended learning among Iranian students.This study aims to fill this gap by translating and validating an existing tool for assessing self-regulated learning in a blended learning environment among Iranian students. Materials & Methods:The forward-backward method was used to translate the original English questionnaire into Persian.After assessing face and content validity, the Persian version was evaluated for its psychometric properties among 330 students from Zahedan Medical University in Iran.Construct validity was analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA).To ensure reliability, we calculated the Average Inter-Item Correlation (AIC), Cronbach's alpha, and McDonald's omega.Additionally, convergent and discriminant validity were examined using Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Maximum Shared Variance (MSV), and Fornell and Larcker's criteria. Results:The findings revealed that the Persian version of the Blended Learning Questionnaire (BLQ) consists of four distinct factors: Accessibility and Guidance (4 items), Social and Contextual (4 items), Delivery of Content (6 items), and Intrinsic and Extrinsic (2 items).Together, these factors accounted for 52.43% of the total variance in the BLQ.The results from the CFA indicated that all goodness-of-fit metrics supported the adequacy of the model.Additionally, the Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and Composite Reliability (CR) scores were all greater than 0.7, demonstrating strong internal consistency.Moreover, the indices showed acceptable levels of both convergent and discriminant validity for the Persian version of the BLQ. Conclusion:The study's findings indicated that the Persian version of the BLQ demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability among Iranian students, making it suitable for academic and research purposes in Persian-speaking countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Education Development
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61882/edcj.18.3.90
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation and psychometric evaluation of a self-regulated learning questionnaire for blended learning among Iranian students

Zahra Arab Borzu, Parisa Hosseini Koukamari, Iman Hegazi, M M Ghadimi Moghadam et al.
Journal of Medical Education Development
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Translation and psychometric evaluation of a self-regulated learning questionnaire for blended learning among Iranian students

Zahra Arab Borzu, Parisa Hosseini Koukamari, Iman Hegazi, M M Ghadimi Moghadam, Maryam Bakhtiyari
article en

Abstract

Background & Objective: The rapid advancement of the Internet and technology has enabled the widespread adoption of blended learning in medical education.However, there is no validated Persian scale to measure self-regulated learning in blended learning among Iranian students.This study aims to fill this gap by translating and validating an existing tool for assessing self-regulated learning in a blended learning environment among Iranian students. Materials & Methods:The forward-backward method was used to translate the original English questionnaire into Persian.After assessing face and content validity, the Persian version was evaluated for its psychometric properties among 330 students from Zahedan Medical University in Iran.Construct validity was analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA).To ensure reliability, we calculated the Average Inter-Item Correlation (AIC), Cronbach's alpha, and McDonald's omega.Additionally, convergent and discriminant validity were examined using Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Maximum Shared Variance (MSV), and Fornell and Larcker's criteria. Results:The findings revealed that the Persian version of the Blended Learning Questionnaire (BLQ) consists of four distinct factors: Accessibility and Guidance (4 items), Social and Contextual (4 items), Delivery of Content (6 items), and Intrinsic and Extrinsic (2 items).Together, these factors accounted for 52.43% of the total variance in the BLQ.The results from the CFA indicated that all goodness-of-fit metrics supported the adequacy of the model.Additionally, the Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and Composite Reliability (CR) scores were all greater than 0.7, demonstrating strong internal consistency.Moreover, the indices showed acceptable levels of both convergent and discriminant validity for the Persian version of the BLQ. Conclusion:The study's findings indicated that the Persian version of the BLQ demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability among Iranian students, making it suitable for academic and research purposes in Persian-speaking countries.

Journal of Medical Education DevelopmentVol. 18(3)
Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals (AU), Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.