Regulation of laboratory-developed tests and in-house in vitro diagnostic medical devices in the United States and the European Union—a comparative overview

Process chains in medical diagnostic laboratories lead to an accurate diagnosis and consequently to optimized personalized therapy recommendations. In addition to approved commercial in vitro diagnostic medical devices, devices and tests manufactured and used within a single diagnostic laboratory play a decisive role in these process chains ensuring state-of-the-art diagnostics and consecutive best patient care. It is vital that the implementation and use of such in-house tests, processes and medical devices developed in diagnostic laboratories by health care professionals is quality assured and meets regulatory and legal requirements. Due to the complexity and variety of these tests as well as their dual use in routine care and clinical trials, a thorough understanding of these regulations and their underlying definitions is critical. This review provides a comparative overview of the current state of the regulation of laboratory-developed tests in the United States and in-house developed in vitro diagnostic medical devices in the European Union. It dissects and compares the relevant regulatory ecosystems to identify conceptual similarities and differences. Our work helps laboratories navigate the regulatory landscape and provides a basis for further discussions among key stakeholders including health care providers, payers, legislators and regulatory agencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105909
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulation of laboratory-developed tests and in-house in vitro diagnostic medical devices in the United States and the European Union—a comparative overview

A-L Volckmar, Susan E. Peters, Albrecht Stenzinger, Manuel Salto‐Tellez et al.
2 citations
ESMO Open
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
2.33
article

Regulation of laboratory-developed tests and in-house in vitro diagnostic medical devices in the United States and the European Union—a comparative overview

A-L Volckmar, Susan E. Peters, Albrecht Stenzinger, Manuel Salto‐Tellez, Michael Vogeser, Daniel Kazdal, Jochen K. Lennerz, André Kahles, Monika Brüggemann, Peter Schirmacher, Jan Budczies, Jack Stone, Roberto Salgado, H. Goldschmid
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Process chains in medical diagnostic laboratories lead to an accurate diagnosis and consequently to optimized personalized therapy recommendations. In addition to approved commercial in vitro diagnostic medical devices, devices and tests manufactured and used within a single diagnostic laboratory play a decisive role in these process chains ensuring state-of-the-art diagnostics and consecutive best patient care. It is vital that the implementation and use of such in-house tests, processes and medical devices developed in diagnostic laboratories by health care professionals is quality assured and meets regulatory and legal requirements. Due to the complexity and variety of these tests as well as their dual use in routine care and clinical trials, a thorough understanding of these regulations and their underlying definitions is critical. This review provides a comparative overview of the current state of the regulation of laboratory-developed tests in the United States and in-house developed in vitro diagnostic medical devices in the European Union. It dissects and compares the relevant regulatory ecosystems to identify conceptual similarities and differences. Our work helps laboratories navigate the regulatory landscape and provides a basis for further discussions among key stakeholders including health care providers, payers, legislators and regulatory agencies.

ESMO OpenVol. 10(12)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Heidelberg University (DE), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Addgene (US), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), IONICS Mass Spectrometry (Canada) (CA), Boston Engineering (United States) (US), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Repligen (United States) (US), University of Lübeck (DE), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
2.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.