How to achieve collective bargaining reform in liberal market economies? The institutional mobilisation of ideational power in Australia

There is limited analysis of how governing parties enact industrial relations policy change. This gap is particularly significant in liberal market economies where labour market inequality and employer-oriented regimes prevail, leaving open questions about how worker-protective reforms can be achieved. To address this gap, this article analyses the Australian government’s successful recent implementation of multi-employer bargaining reform. It utilises a systematic process analysis involving 14 interviews with elites involved in the policy process, and documentary analysis to examine how the Australian government gained the necessary support for its reforms. We identify four strategies whereby the governing Labor Party harnessed institutional power to mobilise ideational power: evidence-based persuasion, compromise, strategic use of policy legacies and framing ideas to address broader interests. Drawing upon political science concepts on institutional and ideational interaction, we contribute new insights to industrial relations scholarship on how governing parties utilise power resources to achieve policy change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x251400196
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to achieve collective bargaining reform in liberal market economies? The institutional mobilisation of ideational power in Australia

Jinru Zhang, Jo Orsatti, Chris F. Wright
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Labor Movements and Unions
article

How to achieve collective bargaining reform in liberal market economies? The institutional mobilisation of ideational power in Australia

Jinru Zhang, Jo Orsatti, Chris F. Wright
article en

Abstract

There is limited analysis of how governing parties enact industrial relations policy change. This gap is particularly significant in liberal market economies where labour market inequality and employer-oriented regimes prevail, leaving open questions about how worker-protective reforms can be achieved. To address this gap, this article analyses the Australian government’s successful recent implementation of multi-employer bargaining reform. It utilises a systematic process analysis involving 14 interviews with elites involved in the policy process, and documentary analysis to examine how the Australian government gained the necessary support for its reforms. We identify four strategies whereby the governing Labor Party harnessed institutional power to mobilise ideational power: evidence-based persuasion, compromise, strategic use of policy legacies and framing ideas to address broader interests. Drawing upon political science concepts on institutional and ideational interaction, we contribute new insights to industrial relations scholarship on how governing parties utilise power resources to achieve policy change.

Economic and Industrial Democracy
The University of Sydney (AU), Migration Institute of Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.