A Country of Platform Paradoxes - Digital Communication Tools used by Green Citizen-Led Initiatives in Denmark

Green Citizen-Led Initiatives (GCLI) have been a long-standing research topic in the area of sustainable human-computer interaction with mixed success. In this paper, we present a larger investigation of the digital tools used by such initiatives in Denmark. We conducted semi-structured interviews with key people in 20 GCLI’s with different goals, sizes, and level of maturity. Our findings revealed that nearly all GCLIs relied mainly on standard tools that came with a variety of drawbacks and problems for them. Furthermore, we uncovered an ubiquitous platform paradox - the need to use Facebook to recruit and contact members despite the misalignment of their own and Facebook’s values - that seems hard to overcome. The challenges and directions outlined in this paper can guide future civic-tech work in this area to tackle common issues of multiple GCLIs and increase the impact of their work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3771882.3771906
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Country of Platform Paradoxes - Digital Communication Tools used by Green Citizen-Led Initiatives in Denmark

Markus Löchtefeld, Malayna Raftopoulos, Anita Nissen, Andreas Beyer Gregersen
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

A Country of Platform Paradoxes - Digital Communication Tools used by Green Citizen-Led Initiatives in Denmark

Markus Löchtefeld, Malayna Raftopoulos, Anita Nissen, Andreas Beyer Gregersen
article en

Abstract

Green Citizen-Led Initiatives (GCLI) have been a long-standing research topic in the area of sustainable human-computer interaction with mixed success. In this paper, we present a larger investigation of the digital tools used by such initiatives in Denmark. We conducted semi-structured interviews with key people in 20 GCLI’s with different goals, sizes, and level of maturity. Our findings revealed that nearly all GCLIs relied mainly on standard tools that came with a variety of drawbacks and problems for them. Furthermore, we uncovered an ubiquitous platform paradox - the need to use Facebook to recruit and contact members despite the misalignment of their own and Facebook’s values - that seems hard to overcome. The challenges and directions outlined in this paper can guide future civic-tech work in this area to tackle common issues of multiple GCLIs and increase the impact of their work.

Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.