Dietary Supplement Strategies During Conditioning Training in Athletes: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Peak and Mean Anaerobic Power, <scp>VO</scp> <sub>2</sub> max, and Endurance Performance

Dietary supplements are often used during training to support energy provision, recovery, and adaptation, yet effects on peak and mean anaerobic power, VO<sub>2</sub>max, and endurance performance remain inconsistent. Unlike prior syntheses centred on neuromuscular outcomes (strength and hypertrophy), this study compared six common supplements-protein, creatine, β-alanine, HMB, vitamin D, and nitrate-on energy-system performance (peak anaerobic power, mean anaerobic power, VO<sub>2</sub>max, and endurance performance) using network meta-analysis. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to 15 March 2025 for RCTs examining dietary supplements and athletic performance. Risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane tool. Random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted in R 4.3.1 and Stata 18. Thirty RCTs involving 693 athletes undergoing training programmes combined with supplements or placebo met the inclusion criteria. For peak anaerobic power, protein (SMD 0.85; 95% CI 0.27-1.44; SUCRA 82.9%; moderate certainty), creatine (0.62; 0.20-1.03; 62.5%; moderate), HMB (0.60; 0.28-0.94; 60.7%; moderate), and β-alanine (0.58; 0.09-1.07; 57.4%; very low) were superior to placebo. In mean power, β-alanine (0.75; 0.20-1.31; 74.1%; very low), protein (0.74; 0.27-1.20; 73.9%; very low), and creatine (0.74; 0.08-1.39; 71.0%; very low) showed consistent benefits, while HMB provided a moderate improvement (0.45; 0.05-0.86; 45.8%; very low). Endurance performance improved only with protein (0.99; 0.16-1.83; 94.3%; very low). No supplement affected VO<sub>2</sub>max. Protein most effectively enhances peak power and endurance performance; β-alanine and creatine excel in mean power; creatine and HMB also aid peak power; none improve VO<sub>2</sub>max. <b>Trial Registration:</b> PROSPERO identifier: CRD420251106522.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Science & Nutrition
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.71243
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dietary Supplement Strategies During Conditioning Training in Athletes: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Peak and Mean Anaerobic Power, VO 2 max, and Endurance Performance

Jiaxin He, Hong Lin, Haoran Li, Cheng Chen et al.
Food Science & Nutrition
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
article

Dietary Supplement Strategies During Conditioning Training in Athletes: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Peak and Mean Anaerobic Power, VO 2 max, and Endurance Performance

Jiaxin He, Hong Lin, Haoran Li, Cheng Chen, Weiqi Zhang, Beiwang Deng
article en

Abstract

Dietary supplements are often used during training to support energy provision, recovery, and adaptation, yet effects on peak and mean anaerobic power, VO<sub>2</sub>max, and endurance performance remain inconsistent. Unlike prior syntheses centred on neuromuscular outcomes (strength and hypertrophy), this study compared six common supplements-protein, creatine, β-alanine, HMB, vitamin D, and nitrate-on energy-system performance (peak anaerobic power, mean anaerobic power, VO<sub>2</sub>max, and endurance performance) using network meta-analysis. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to 15 March 2025 for RCTs examining dietary supplements and athletic performance. Risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane tool. Random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted in R 4.3.1 and Stata 18. Thirty RCTs involving 693 athletes undergoing training programmes combined with supplements or placebo met the inclusion criteria. For peak anaerobic power, protein (SMD 0.85; 95% CI 0.27-1.44; SUCRA 82.9%; moderate certainty), creatine (0.62; 0.20-1.03; 62.5%; moderate), HMB (0.60; 0.28-0.94; 60.7%; moderate), and β-alanine (0.58; 0.09-1.07; 57.4%; very low) were superior to placebo. In mean power, β-alanine (0.75; 0.20-1.31; 74.1%; very low), protein (0.74; 0.27-1.20; 73.9%; very low), and creatine (0.74; 0.08-1.39; 71.0%; very low) showed consistent benefits, while HMB provided a moderate improvement (0.45; 0.05-0.86; 45.8%; very low). Endurance performance improved only with protein (0.99; 0.16-1.83; 94.3%; very low). No supplement affected VO<sub>2</sub>max. Protein most effectively enhances peak power and endurance performance; β-alanine and creatine excel in mean power; creatine and HMB also aid peak power; none improve VO<sub>2</sub>max. <b>Trial Registration:</b> PROSPERO identifier: CRD420251106522.

Food Science & NutritionVol. 13(12)
Guangzhou Sport University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.