“The Priestess, the Medium, the Prophetess”: Identity in British Modernist Literary Patronage

Abstract Placing modernist literary production into the larger context of avant-garde personal networks greatly erodes the myth of the modernist creative genius. It allows for an understanding of the complex mechanisms at play even in small-scale productions, each capable of influencing the final literary work. Easy to see from hindsight, especially with the help of Pierre Bourdieu and Howard Becker, it was also felt acutely by the modernist writers themselves. For fear of their work being viewed as unoriginal or, even more radically, collaborative, writers such as Lytton Strachey and D. H. Lawrence took pains to distance themselves from their patrons who often facilitated the production of their works by means of financial or non-material support. In order to navigate the labyrinthian relationships of patronage, both they and their patrons, chiefly Ottoline Morrell, assumed various identities and employed the narrative strategies explored in this paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2025-2030
Primary Topic
Modernist Literature and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The Priestess, the Medium, the Prophetess”: Identity in British Modernist Literary Patronage

Kristína Melišová
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik
Modernist Literature and Criticism
article

“The Priestess, the Medium, the Prophetess”: Identity in British Modernist Literary Patronage

Kristína Melišová
article en

Abstract

Abstract Placing modernist literary production into the larger context of avant-garde personal networks greatly erodes the myth of the modernist creative genius. It allows for an understanding of the complex mechanisms at play even in small-scale productions, each capable of influencing the final literary work. Easy to see from hindsight, especially with the help of Pierre Bourdieu and Howard Becker, it was also felt acutely by the modernist writers themselves. For fear of their work being viewed as unoriginal or, even more radically, collaborative, writers such as Lytton Strachey and D. H. Lawrence took pains to distance themselves from their patrons who often facilitated the production of their works by means of financial or non-material support. In order to navigate the labyrinthian relationships of patronage, both they and their patrons, chiefly Ottoline Morrell, assumed various identities and employed the narrative strategies explored in this paper.

Zeitschrift für Anglistik und AmerikanistikVol. 73(4)
Masaryk University (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Modernist Literature and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“The Priestess, the Medium, the Prophetess”: Identity in British Modernist Literary Patronage — Kristína Melišová · Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS