Enabling ethics mechanisms in the governance of algorithmic artificial persons (ALAP)

In the global context of a ‘new social contract’ and a ‘flourishing world’, ethics mechanisms such as principles, guidelines, recommendations, standards, frameworks and checklists, are being established by public and private organisations and governments for the governance of 'algorithmic artificial persons (ALAP)', autonomous artificial intelligence (AAI) systems and emerging information and communication technologies (eICT). This paper examines, and identifies eleven gaps in the current ethics mechanisms, employing a ‘qualitative evidence synthesis’ (QES). Additionally, it proposes a ‘prescriptive conceptual model’ of an ‘anticipatory general ethics library’ (AnGEL), to enable resolution of these gaps. AnGEL is conceptually modelled as an implementable library of norms and rules for ALAPs / AAI systems and eICT, agnostic of domains and use cases. The conceptually modelled AnGEL may, post ‘verification’ through further discourse, and subsequent ‘validation’ of a prototype, be hosted on a cyber-physical intermediary. It can be rendered accessible through ‘Ethics-as-a-Service’ and provide ‘ethics interoperability’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Technology
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100143
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enabling ethics mechanisms in the governance of algorithmic artificial persons (ALAP)

Christopher Stanton, Curt Stevens, Siri Padmanabhan Poti
1 citations
Journal of Responsible Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Enabling ethics mechanisms in the governance of algorithmic artificial persons (ALAP)

Christopher Stanton, Curt Stevens, Siri Padmanabhan Poti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the global context of a ‘new social contract’ and a ‘flourishing world’, ethics mechanisms such as principles, guidelines, recommendations, standards, frameworks and checklists, are being established by public and private organisations and governments for the governance of 'algorithmic artificial persons (ALAP)', autonomous artificial intelligence (AAI) systems and emerging information and communication technologies (eICT). This paper examines, and identifies eleven gaps in the current ethics mechanisms, employing a ‘qualitative evidence synthesis’ (QES). Additionally, it proposes a ‘prescriptive conceptual model’ of an ‘anticipatory general ethics library’ (AnGEL), to enable resolution of these gaps. AnGEL is conceptually modelled as an implementable library of norms and rules for ALAPs / AAI systems and eICT, agnostic of domains and use cases. The conceptually modelled AnGEL may, post ‘verification’ through further discourse, and subsequent ‘validation’ of a prototype, be hosted on a cyber-physical intermediary. It can be rendered accessible through ‘Ethics-as-a-Service’ and provide ‘ethics interoperability’.

Journal of Responsible TechnologyVol. 25
Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enabling ethics mechanisms in the governance of algorithmic artificial persons (ALAP) — Christopher Stanton, Curt Stevens, et al. · Journal of Responsible Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS