Conversion and drift of traditional institutions under democratization: case of the ‘evolved’ household registration system in Taiwan

The Household Registration System (HRS) is commonly regarded as an instrument of social control and undemocratic. Paradoxically, it still survives in some electoral democracies with limited calls for its abandonment. This thematic study examines the HRS from a new Asian democracy, Taiwan, and responds to this puzzling phenomenon: why is this system still maintained after democratization? Taiwan has universal suffrage since 1996 but its HRS remains after 30 years of full democracy. This article reviews the evolution of the HRS in Taiwan from authoritarian through the democratic era and explores the rationales for its standstill after three decades of electoral democracy through the lens of institutional conversion and drift. The functions of the HRS in Taiwan have no longer been social control as in its outset. Its preservation in the democratic context without substantial reform has also accounted for several maladministration and corrupt phenomena.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2025.2593498
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conversion and drift of traditional institutions under democratization: case of the ‘evolved’ household registration system in Taiwan

Lawrence Ka-Ki Ho, Bennis Wai Yip So
Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

Conversion and drift of traditional institutions under democratization: case of the ‘evolved’ household registration system in Taiwan

Lawrence Ka-Ki Ho, Bennis Wai Yip So
article en

Abstract

The Household Registration System (HRS) is commonly regarded as an instrument of social control and undemocratic. Paradoxically, it still survives in some electoral democracies with limited calls for its abandonment. This thematic study examines the HRS from a new Asian democracy, Taiwan, and responds to this puzzling phenomenon: why is this system still maintained after democratization? Taiwan has universal suffrage since 1996 but its HRS remains after 30 years of full democracy. This article reviews the evolution of the HRS in Taiwan from authoritarian through the democratic era and explores the rationales for its standstill after three decades of electoral democracy through the lens of institutional conversion and drift. The functions of the HRS in Taiwan have no longer been social control as in its outset. Its preservation in the democratic context without substantial reform has also accounted for several maladministration and corrupt phenomena.

Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies
National Taiwan Normal University (TW), National Chengchi University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.