Bearing Capacity of Tension Steel Piles in Thinly Inter‐Layered Soils: Numerical Class‐A Prediction vs. Field Measurements

ABSTRACT This study investigates the bearing capacity of tension piles and pile‐soil interaction during loading. Discrepancies between predicted and measured bearing capacities in previous tests motivated the study, where analytical methods showed considerable scatter and uncertainties in design. A large‐scale field test was conducted on three additional adjacent tension piles (Pile 1, 2 and 3), featuring extensive fibre‐optic strain measurements. Concurrently, a numerical Class‐A prediction was developed beforehand to analyse pile‐soil interaction and predict bearing capacity, utilising hypoplastic and visco‐hypoplastic models for the thinly inter‐layered subsoils. The fibre‐optic measurements revealed significant locked‐in bending strains post‐installation, prior to loading. The results showed a correlation between pronounced bending strains and lower load‐bearing capacity. Numerical predictions were compared with the field measurements, providing good agreement with Pile 1, which exhibited minimal installation‐induced bending and thus represented an idealised case. This comparison offered valuable insights into tension pile failure mechanisms and load capacity. This research enhances understanding of tension pile behaviour in complex soils and underscores the necessity of optimising installation methods to improve load‐bearing capacities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70132
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bearing Capacity of Tension Steel Piles in Thinly Inter‐Layered Soils: Numerical Class‐A Prediction vs. Field Measurements

Diaa Alkateeb, Jürgen Grabe
2 citations
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
1.91
article

Bearing Capacity of Tension Steel Piles in Thinly Inter‐Layered Soils: Numerical Class‐A Prediction vs. Field Measurements

Diaa Alkateeb, Jürgen Grabe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the bearing capacity of tension piles and pile‐soil interaction during loading. Discrepancies between predicted and measured bearing capacities in previous tests motivated the study, where analytical methods showed considerable scatter and uncertainties in design. A large‐scale field test was conducted on three additional adjacent tension piles (Pile 1, 2 and 3), featuring extensive fibre‐optic strain measurements. Concurrently, a numerical Class‐A prediction was developed beforehand to analyse pile‐soil interaction and predict bearing capacity, utilising hypoplastic and visco‐hypoplastic models for the thinly inter‐layered subsoils. The fibre‐optic measurements revealed significant locked‐in bending strains post‐installation, prior to loading. The results showed a correlation between pronounced bending strains and lower load‐bearing capacity. Numerical predictions were compared with the field measurements, providing good agreement with Pile 1, which exhibited minimal installation‐induced bending and thus represented an idealised case. This comparison offered valuable insights into tension pile failure mechanisms and load capacity. This research enhances understanding of tension pile behaviour in complex soils and underscores the necessity of optimising installation methods to improve load‐bearing capacities.

International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in GeomechanicsVol. 50(3)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.