Assessing the Impact of Node Density on MANET Routing: A Comparative Study of NTSM, AODV, and DSDV Using NS2 Simulation

MANETs provide a dynamic, decentralised communication architecture that enables nodes to form spontaneous networks. They are, therefore, best suited for situations where fixed infrastructure does not exist. However, performance in MANETs depends heavily on the routing protocol used and the node density. This paper describes the performance evaluation of three necessary routing protocols, NTSM, AODV, and DSDV, with respect to different node density conditions. We use extensive simulations on the NS2 simulation framework to analyses the performance of these protocols at several node densities. The critical performance metrics under study include packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, network throughput, and routing overhead. The systematic comparative study aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the protocols and their adaptability to dynamic variations within the network. This study explains in detail how NTSM, AODV, and DSDV respond to changes in node density in simulated MANET environments. They could serve as valuable guidelines for selecting the best routing protocol for different deployment types. Furthermore, these results highlight that, when designing and optimising MANETs, network dynamics and node density variations should also be considered, particularly through simulation tools such as NS2 for performance evaluation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35940/ijsce.f3699.15051125
Primary Topic
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Impact of Node Density on MANET Routing: A Comparative Study of NTSM, AODV, and DSDV Using NS2 Simulation

Rani Sahu, Vinay Sahu
International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
article

Assessing the Impact of Node Density on MANET Routing: A Comparative Study of NTSM, AODV, and DSDV Using NS2 Simulation

Rani Sahu, Vinay Sahu
article en

Abstract

MANETs provide a dynamic, decentralised communication architecture that enables nodes to form spontaneous networks. They are, therefore, best suited for situations where fixed infrastructure does not exist. However, performance in MANETs depends heavily on the routing protocol used and the node density. This paper describes the performance evaluation of three necessary routing protocols, NTSM, AODV, and DSDV, with respect to different node density conditions. We use extensive simulations on the NS2 simulation framework to analyses the performance of these protocols at several node densities. The critical performance metrics under study include packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, network throughput, and routing overhead. The systematic comparative study aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the protocols and their adaptability to dynamic variations within the network. This study explains in detail how NTSM, AODV, and DSDV respond to changes in node density in simulated MANET environments. They could serve as valuable guidelines for selecting the best routing protocol for different deployment types. Furthermore, these results highlight that, when designing and optimising MANETs, network dynamics and node density variations should also be considered, particularly through simulation tools such as NS2 for performance evaluation.

International Journal of Soft Computing and EngineeringVol. 15(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.