Follow-up on test referrals and results: Whose responsibility is it?
BackgroundInadequate test follow-up is a major patient safety concern which can have implications for missed or delayed diagnosis and treatment. The community medicine setting poses challenges for test follow-up, which involves ensuring patient performance, receiving information about abnormal results, and informing patients.ObjectiveThis research aimed to learn how community physicians perceive and cope with test follow-up.MethodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 20 community physicians: 10 family physicians and 10 other specialists.FindingsThe potential for inadequate follow-up on tests emerged from the interviews as a significant risk factor for patients. According to interviewees, inadequate follow-up includes both ensuring that referred tests are performed and receiving and informing patients about abnormal results. It stems from heavy workloads, poor communication between family physicians and specialists, and patients being treated by multiple physicians. The coping strategies employed by physicians, such as encouraging patients to perform tests, contacting patients, documenting follow-ups, and using the healthcare organization's information technology alert system, are described as insufficiently effective.ConclusionsSuggestions are made for enhancing the responsibility of all parties in order to improve the management of test referrals follow-up, ensure that physicians receive the test results, and thus reduce the incidence of adverse events.
Authors
- Tamar Adar
- Ariela Popper‐Giveon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9252-9360)
- Yael Keshet (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9128-4648)
Institutions
- Western Galilee College (IL)
- Himeji Hinomoto College (JP)
- David Yellin College of Education (IL)
- Clalit Health Services (IL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
- Published
- 2025-11-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251401360
- Primary Topic
- Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00