Follow-up on test referrals and results: Whose responsibility is it?

BackgroundInadequate test follow-up is a major patient safety concern which can have implications for missed or delayed diagnosis and treatment. The community medicine setting poses challenges for test follow-up, which involves ensuring patient performance, receiving information about abnormal results, and informing patients.ObjectiveThis research aimed to learn how community physicians perceive and cope with test follow-up.MethodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 20 community physicians: 10 family physicians and 10 other specialists.FindingsThe potential for inadequate follow-up on tests emerged from the interviews as a significant risk factor for patients. According to interviewees, inadequate follow-up includes both ensuring that referred tests are performed and receiving and informing patients about abnormal results. It stems from heavy workloads, poor communication between family physicians and specialists, and patients being treated by multiple physicians. The coping strategies employed by physicians, such as encouraging patients to perform tests, contacting patients, documenting follow-ups, and using the healthcare organization's information technology alert system, are described as insufficiently effective.ConclusionsSuggestions are made for enhancing the responsibility of all parties in order to improve the management of test referrals follow-up, ensure that physicians receive the test results, and thus reduce the incidence of adverse events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251401360
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Follow-up on test referrals and results: Whose responsibility is it?

Tamar Adar, Ariela Popper‐Giveon, Yael Keshet
International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Follow-up on test referrals and results: Whose responsibility is it?

Tamar Adar, Ariela Popper‐Giveon, Yael Keshet
article en

Abstract

BackgroundInadequate test follow-up is a major patient safety concern which can have implications for missed or delayed diagnosis and treatment. The community medicine setting poses challenges for test follow-up, which involves ensuring patient performance, receiving information about abnormal results, and informing patients.ObjectiveThis research aimed to learn how community physicians perceive and cope with test follow-up.MethodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 20 community physicians: 10 family physicians and 10 other specialists.FindingsThe potential for inadequate follow-up on tests emerged from the interviews as a significant risk factor for patients. According to interviewees, inadequate follow-up includes both ensuring that referred tests are performed and receiving and informing patients about abnormal results. It stems from heavy workloads, poor communication between family physicians and specialists, and patients being treated by multiple physicians. The coping strategies employed by physicians, such as encouraging patients to perform tests, contacting patients, documenting follow-ups, and using the healthcare organization's information technology alert system, are described as insufficiently effective.ConclusionsSuggestions are made for enhancing the responsibility of all parties in order to improve the management of test referrals follow-up, ensure that physicians receive the test results, and thus reduce the incidence of adverse events.

International Journal of Risk & Safety in MedicineVol. 37(1)
Western Galilee College (IL), Himeji Hinomoto College (JP), David Yellin College of Education (IL), Clalit Health Services (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Follow-up on test referrals and results: Whose responsibility is it? — Tamar Adar, Ariela Popper‐Giveon, et al. · International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS