Social Influence across conversational contexts: a new taxonomy of social influence techniques and public understanding of the characteristics of persuasion, manipulation, and coercion in interpersonal dialogue

We propose a taxonomy of seven social influence strategies and 42 techniques for interpersonal dialogue across diverse settings. Perceptions of these techniques, gathered from 164 UK participants, show persuasive techniques as low-harm and covert, while manipulative-coercive techniques are high-harm and overt. Ambiguities exist where some techniques fit both categories, highlighting significant variability in individual perceptions. We highlight that even benign techniques like humour or friendliness can covertly bypass defences, hiding the speaker's true intentions. This work underscores the importance of understanding receiver perceptions of social influence techniques across a range of settings, including interactions with large language models (LLMs), which may employ such techniques. By offering a universal taxonomy of social influence techniques and associated public perceptions, we aim to enhance understanding of social influence in varied conversational contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Influence
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2025.2590842
Primary Topic
Psychology of Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Influence across conversational contexts: a new taxonomy of social influence techniques and public understanding of the characteristics of persuasion, manipulation, and coercion in interpersonal dialogue

Kate Muir, Nigel Dewdney, Faye Walker, Adam Joinson
Social Influence
Psychology of Social Influence
article

Social Influence across conversational contexts: a new taxonomy of social influence techniques and public understanding of the characteristics of persuasion, manipulation, and coercion in interpersonal dialogue

Kate Muir, Nigel Dewdney, Faye Walker, Adam Joinson
article en

Abstract

We propose a taxonomy of seven social influence strategies and 42 techniques for interpersonal dialogue across diverse settings. Perceptions of these techniques, gathered from 164 UK participants, show persuasive techniques as low-harm and covert, while manipulative-coercive techniques are high-harm and overt. Ambiguities exist where some techniques fit both categories, highlighting significant variability in individual perceptions. We highlight that even benign techniques like humour or friendliness can covertly bypass defences, hiding the speaker's true intentions. This work underscores the importance of understanding receiver perceptions of social influence techniques across a range of settings, including interactions with large language models (LLMs), which may employ such techniques. By offering a universal taxonomy of social influence techniques and associated public perceptions, we aim to enhance understanding of social influence in varied conversational contexts.

Social InfluenceVol. 20(1)
Digital Science (United States) (US), University of Bath (GB), Bath Spa University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Psychology of Social Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.