The relevance of meritocratic beliefs for redistributive preferences increases with income

A leading explanation for why in democratic societies the rich are not taxed more is that meritocratic beliefs breed tolerance for inequality. We problematize this account by claiming that, unlike the rich, the poor support greater redistribution regardless of how meritocratic they perceive society to be. The claim is tested using a cross-national survey and a preregistered experimental game that exogenized both income and perceptions of meritocratic fairness. Analysis of both survey and experimental data supports the proposed interaction effect between income and perceived meritocratic fairness on demand for redistribution. We conclude that while meritocratic beliefs can explain why the rich do not support more redistribution, it fails to explain the poor’s inequality acceptance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Research
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103294
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relevance of meritocratic beliefs for redistributive preferences increases with income

Jonne Kamphorst, Irene Pañeda-Fernández, Arnout van de Rijt, Balaraju Battu
2 citations
Social Science Research
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
4.73
article

The relevance of meritocratic beliefs for redistributive preferences increases with income

Jonne Kamphorst, Irene Pañeda-Fernández, Arnout van de Rijt, Balaraju Battu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A leading explanation for why in democratic societies the rich are not taxed more is that meritocratic beliefs breed tolerance for inequality. We problematize this account by claiming that, unlike the rich, the poor support greater redistribution regardless of how meritocratic they perceive society to be. The claim is tested using a cross-national survey and a preregistered experimental game that exogenized both income and perceptions of meritocratic fairness. Analysis of both survey and experimental data supports the proposed interaction effect between income and perceived meritocratic fairness on demand for redistribution. We conclude that while meritocratic beliefs can explain why the rich do not support more redistribution, it fails to explain the poor’s inequality acceptance.

Social Science ResearchVol. 134
New York University Abu Dhabi (AE), WZB Berlin Social Science Center (DE), Stanford Medicine (US), European University Institute (IT), Stanford University (US)
European University Institute, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.