Lab-to-field gap in battery aging studies: Mismatch of operating conditions between laboratory environments and real-world automotive applications

In response to the growing demand for electric vehicles, ensuring the longevity of traction batteries has become a central focus of scientific research. While most aging studies rely on accelerated aging testing with tightened stress factors, real-world battery operation reveals fundamentally different load profiles and aging conditions. To disclose the gap between the laboratory and the real-world application, we collected and assessed almost 2600 stress factor combinations from 201 different calendar and cycle aging studies. Moreover, we gathered and analyzed vehicle data from over 72 000 km of everyday usage of seven vehicles in public road traffic in Germany and extracted the related battery-specific load spectra. The stress factor combinations chosen in the literature show a trend towards high temperatures and state of charges (SOCs) during storage in calendar aging studies. In contrast, cycle aging tests are predominantly performed at full depth of discharge (DOD) or elevated average SOC levels, with current rates of primarily ± 1 C at 25 °C or slightly elevated temperatures. Contrary to this, the field data analysis reveals the following main findings: Driving events rarely exceed 30 km in distance or 40 min in duration, with an average driving speed of 61.1 km h − 1 . This leads to average current rates of − 0.2 C in discharging and 0.1C in charging direction and average cycle depths of less than 30%, while the average battery pack temperature ranges around 17 °C. Comparing laboratory test conditions with stress conditions in field applications reveals three major discrepancies: First, the stress levels applied are substantially higher than the stresses acting in real-world operation. Second, the dynamic load characteristic of real-world vehicle operation is rarely reflected; most studies work with synthetic constant current load cycles. Third, intermediate rest periods, which are predominant in real-world use, are omitted in most studies. This raises concerns about the transferability and applicability of findings from accelerated aging tests to automotive real-world applications. • Review and analysis of 2600 test points from 200 + accelerated aging studies. • Analysis of 72 000 km of field data from 4821 vehicle operations over 38 months. • Revealing a substantial mismatch between laboratory test and real-world stresses. • Full dataset available open access, including HV battery, drivetrain, and odometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eTransportation
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etran.2025.100518
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lab-to-field gap in battery aging studies: Mismatch of operating conditions between laboratory environments and real-world automotive applications

Lukas Köning, Cristina Grosu, Markus Schreiber, Markus Lienkamp et al.
1 citations
eTransportation
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
article

Lab-to-field gap in battery aging studies: Mismatch of operating conditions between laboratory environments and real-world automotive applications

Lukas Köning, Cristina Grosu, Markus Schreiber, Markus Lienkamp, Georg Balke, Kareem Abo Gamra, Brian Dietermann, Roman Urban, Jonas Kayl
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In response to the growing demand for electric vehicles, ensuring the longevity of traction batteries has become a central focus of scientific research. While most aging studies rely on accelerated aging testing with tightened stress factors, real-world battery operation reveals fundamentally different load profiles and aging conditions. To disclose the gap between the laboratory and the real-world application, we collected and assessed almost 2600 stress factor combinations from 201 different calendar and cycle aging studies. Moreover, we gathered and analyzed vehicle data from over 72 000 km of everyday usage of seven vehicles in public road traffic in Germany and extracted the related battery-specific load spectra. The stress factor combinations chosen in the literature show a trend towards high temperatures and state of charges (SOCs) during storage in calendar aging studies. In contrast, cycle aging tests are predominantly performed at full depth of discharge (DOD) or elevated average SOC levels, with current rates of primarily ± 1 C at 25 °C or slightly elevated temperatures. Contrary to this, the field data analysis reveals the following main findings: Driving events rarely exceed 30 km in distance or 40 min in duration, with an average driving speed of 61.1 km h − 1 . This leads to average current rates of − 0.2 C in discharging and 0.1C in charging direction and average cycle depths of less than 30%, while the average battery pack temperature ranges around 17 °C. Comparing laboratory test conditions with stress conditions in field applications reveals three major discrepancies: First, the stress levels applied are substantially higher than the stresses acting in real-world operation. Second, the dynamic load characteristic of real-world vehicle operation is rarely reflected; most studies work with synthetic constant current load cycles. Third, intermediate rest periods, which are predominant in real-world use, are omitted in most studies. This raises concerns about the transferability and applicability of findings from accelerated aging tests to automotive real-world applications. • Review and analysis of 2600 test points from 200 + accelerated aging studies. • Analysis of 72 000 km of field data from 4821 vehicle operations over 38 months. • Revealing a substantial mismatch between laboratory test and real-world stresses. • Full dataset available open access, including HV battery, drivetrain, and odometry.

eTransportationVol. 27
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.