A comparative analysis of setup accuracy between 6D and 3D treatment couches in radiotherapy for lung cancer with brain metastases

To evaluate the accuracy of six-dimensional (6D) treatment couches in minimizing setup errors compared with three-dimensional (3D) treatment couches during radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 lung cancer patients with brain metastases who received stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for brain metastases. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the availability of treatment units at the time of planning: 20 patients were treated using a 3D couch, and 20 patients with a 6D couch. Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) registration was used to measure residual setup errors in the x , y , and z axes at two key cranial anatomical landmarks, specifically the internal acoustic meatus (IAM) and crista galli (CG), for both groups. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to assess the normality of the data, and the Mann-Whitney U- test was performed to determine statistical differences between the two groups, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Baseline data indicated that the two groups were well-balanced in terms of gender, age, and distribution of pathological types, number of brain metastases, maximum metastases volume, and relative distance between metastases and isocenter ( P >0.05). Setup error data in all directions (IAM_ x / y / z , CG_ x / y / z ) did not follow a normal distribution ( P <0.05). The Mann-Whitney U- test revealed that setup errors in the 6D group were significantly smaller than those in the 3D group across all directions (IAM_ x / y / z , CG_ x / y / z ) (all P <0.001). The mean error reduction exceeded 1 mm in all directions, with the most significant difference observed in the CG_X direction: 2.2 (1.3, 3.3) mm in the 3D group versus 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) mm in the 6D group, representing a difference of 1.9 mm. The six-dimensional (6D) treatment couch effectively minimizes residual setup errors, especially rotational ones, in radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmp.2025.11.004
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of setup accuracy between 6D and 3D treatment couches in radiotherapy for lung cancer with brain metastases

Wei Zhang, Wenyang Liu, Bofei Liu, Fukui Huan et al.
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

A comparative analysis of setup accuracy between 6D and 3D treatment couches in radiotherapy for lung cancer with brain metastases

Wei Zhang, Wenyang Liu, Bofei Liu, Fukui Huan, Shiyu Wu, Yingwei Wu, Shirui Qin, Fan Liu, Wenbo Zhang, Lu Hou, Kun Zhang
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of six-dimensional (6D) treatment couches in minimizing setup errors compared with three-dimensional (3D) treatment couches during radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 lung cancer patients with brain metastases who received stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for brain metastases. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the availability of treatment units at the time of planning: 20 patients were treated using a 3D couch, and 20 patients with a 6D couch. Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) registration was used to measure residual setup errors in the x , y , and z axes at two key cranial anatomical landmarks, specifically the internal acoustic meatus (IAM) and crista galli (CG), for both groups. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to assess the normality of the data, and the Mann-Whitney U- test was performed to determine statistical differences between the two groups, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Baseline data indicated that the two groups were well-balanced in terms of gender, age, and distribution of pathological types, number of brain metastases, maximum metastases volume, and relative distance between metastases and isocenter ( P >0.05). Setup error data in all directions (IAM_ x / y / z , CG_ x / y / z ) did not follow a normal distribution ( P <0.05). The Mann-Whitney U- test revealed that setup errors in the 6D group were significantly smaller than those in the 3D group across all directions (IAM_ x / y / z , CG_ x / y / z ) (all P <0.001). The mean error reduction exceeded 1 mm in all directions, with the most significant difference observed in the CG_X direction: 2.2 (1.3, 3.3) mm in the 3D group versus 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) mm in the 6D group, representing a difference of 1.9 mm. The six-dimensional (6D) treatment couch effectively minimizes residual setup errors, especially rotational ones, in radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases

Radiation Medicine and ProtectionVol. 6(6)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.