Dental trauma coverage in student accident insurance: a framework-guided document analysis

Dental trauma is common within school communities, yet access to timely care remains a challenge. Insurance coverage can reduce financial barriers and support coordinated responses. However, there are limited insights into how traumatic dental injuries (TDI) are covered and framed in Student Accident Insurance (SAI). This study applies framework-guided criteria to evaluate the content and framing of TDI in Malaysian SAI policies from 2023 to 2025. A qualitative document analysis was conducted on a purposive sample of SAI products using predefined criteria based on standard insurance policy elements and Entman’s theory of framing. Content analysis was used to classify policy elements, while frame analysis examined how TDI was conceptualized in brochures, disclosure sheets and policy wordings. Of the 48 registered insurance providers, five SAI products offering TDI coverage for full-time students aged approximately 3 to 21, mainly in kindergartens, primary or secondary schools, were identified. Plans with premiums ranging from Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) 10 to 30 were offered. Plans priced at MYR 20 and 30 typically included a TDI sublimit capped at MYR 500. Dental appliances, routine check-ups and dentures were excluded in AIA, Generali and Tokio Marine policies. TDI was uniformly framed as accident-related, with Zurich uniquely framing it as bodily injury. Coverage was for school activities, excluding high-risk sports. Responsibility was variably assigned to parents, school or both. Most providers required initial treatment within 24 h, follow-up within 14 days and claims notice within 30 days of the accident. Zurich required earlier claims notice but allowed extended reimbursement. Framework-guided criteria allow a systematic assessment of the different aspects through which SAI policies address and convey TDI coverage. Although Malaysian SAI policies offer generally affordable and standardised TDI coverage, variations in exclusions and framing highlight areas for policy improvement. Clear and consistent policy framing may contribute to strengthening community-based dental care by ensuring equitable and timely access to TDI management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-07223-4
Primary Topic
Dental Trauma and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dental trauma coverage in student accident insurance: a framework-guided document analysis

Amy Kia Cheen Liew, Dalia Abdullah
BMC Oral Health
Dental Trauma and Treatments
article

Dental trauma coverage in student accident insurance: a framework-guided document analysis

Amy Kia Cheen Liew, Dalia Abdullah
article en

Abstract

Dental trauma is common within school communities, yet access to timely care remains a challenge. Insurance coverage can reduce financial barriers and support coordinated responses. However, there are limited insights into how traumatic dental injuries (TDI) are covered and framed in Student Accident Insurance (SAI). This study applies framework-guided criteria to evaluate the content and framing of TDI in Malaysian SAI policies from 2023 to 2025. A qualitative document analysis was conducted on a purposive sample of SAI products using predefined criteria based on standard insurance policy elements and Entman’s theory of framing. Content analysis was used to classify policy elements, while frame analysis examined how TDI was conceptualized in brochures, disclosure sheets and policy wordings. Of the 48 registered insurance providers, five SAI products offering TDI coverage for full-time students aged approximately 3 to 21, mainly in kindergartens, primary or secondary schools, were identified. Plans with premiums ranging from Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) 10 to 30 were offered. Plans priced at MYR 20 and 30 typically included a TDI sublimit capped at MYR 500. Dental appliances, routine check-ups and dentures were excluded in AIA, Generali and Tokio Marine policies. TDI was uniformly framed as accident-related, with Zurich uniquely framing it as bodily injury. Coverage was for school activities, excluding high-risk sports. Responsibility was variably assigned to parents, school or both. Most providers required initial treatment within 24 h, follow-up within 14 days and claims notice within 30 days of the accident. Zurich required earlier claims notice but allowed extended reimbursement. Framework-guided criteria allow a systematic assessment of the different aspects through which SAI policies address and convey TDI coverage. Although Malaysian SAI policies offer generally affordable and standardised TDI coverage, variations in exclusions and framing highlight areas for policy improvement. Clear and consistent policy framing may contribute to strengthening community-based dental care by ensuring equitable and timely access to TDI management.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 25(1)
University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (MY), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Dental Trauma and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.