MeetMulti-X: A benchmark analysis of scaling and prompting large language models on automatic minuting

The task of automatic minuting, i.e., capturing all the points from transcripts of multi-party meetings, presents considerable challenges owing to the spontaneous and complex nature of discussions. As organisations increasingly depend on meetings for decision-making, the need for efficient and optimised minuting has intensified, underscoring the shortcomings of manual note-taking due to cognitive overload and diverted participant engagement. This study systematically analyses the impact of scaling Large Language Models (LLMs) on automatic minuting, emphasising key factors including pretrained dataset size, model size, context length, and prompt length. The benchmark evaluation includes both quantitative and qualitative with 19 open-source models (from 77M to 70B parameters) and 4 closed-source models (over 1T parameters) across 4 meeting corpora and prompts. Our findings indicate that (1) models with less than 8B parameters offer a favorable trade-off between performance and efficiency, achieving comparable results to their larger counterparts. (2) scaling pretrained data size improves performance up to a threshold, beyond which gains diminish. (3) context length exhibits a non-linear effect, with optimal performance around 8K–16K tokens. (4) longer prompts consistently degrade output quality, highlighting the need for concise and well-structured prompting. To the best of our knowledge this is the first work, exploring scaling LLMS on automatic minuting. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MeetMultiX-9A36

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems with Applications
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130428
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MeetMulti-X: A benchmark analysis of scaling and prompting large language models on automatic minuting

Ashima Sood, Bryan Gardiner, Joan Condell, Muskaan Singh
Expert Systems with Applications
Topic Modeling
article

MeetMulti-X: A benchmark analysis of scaling and prompting large language models on automatic minuting

Ashima Sood, Bryan Gardiner, Joan Condell, Muskaan Singh
article en

Abstract

The task of automatic minuting, i.e., capturing all the points from transcripts of multi-party meetings, presents considerable challenges owing to the spontaneous and complex nature of discussions. As organisations increasingly depend on meetings for decision-making, the need for efficient and optimised minuting has intensified, underscoring the shortcomings of manual note-taking due to cognitive overload and diverted participant engagement. This study systematically analyses the impact of scaling Large Language Models (LLMs) on automatic minuting, emphasising key factors including pretrained dataset size, model size, context length, and prompt length. The benchmark evaluation includes both quantitative and qualitative with 19 open-source models (from 77M to 70B parameters) and 4 closed-source models (over 1T parameters) across 4 meeting corpora and prompts. Our findings indicate that (1) models with less than 8B parameters offer a favorable trade-off between performance and efficiency, achieving comparable results to their larger counterparts. (2) scaling pretrained data size improves performance up to a threshold, beyond which gains diminish. (3) context length exhibits a non-linear effect, with optimal performance around 8K–16K tokens. (4) longer prompts consistently degrade output quality, highlighting the need for concise and well-structured prompting. To the best of our knowledge this is the first work, exploring scaling LLMS on automatic minuting. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MeetMultiX-9A36

Expert Systems with ApplicationsVol. 303
Ulster University, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.