Hunting shapes wildlife behavioural responses to non-lethal recreational activities in a protected area

Hunting and non-lethal recreational activities are often conducted in the same or neighbouring areas of natural environments, and both trigger responses in wildlife that resemble anti-predator behaviour. A limited amount of research has assessed the combined effects of non-lethal human activities and hunting on non-target species, although understanding these effects is crucial for wildlife conservation and protected area management. This study examined the effects of different recreation and hunting intensities on the probability of detecting red deer ( Cervus elaphus ), roe deer ( Capreolus capreolus ), wild boar ( Sus scrofa ), red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) and Eurasian lynx ( Lynx lynx ). Data were collected from 61 pairs of camera traps placed in the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany, with one camera from the pair placed on a trail and the other at a nearby location within the forest. Recurrent event analysis was used to estimate the temporal dynamics of the wildlife event rate within 24 h following a recreation event. Increased hunting intensity led to a significantly increasing avoidance of recreational activities by all species, independent of whether they were subjected to hunting or not (estimate −0.009 – 0.012, depending on species and camera placement). Proximity to recreational activities impacted the spatio-temporal interactions between wildlife and recreationists, with higher levels of recreation leading to a shorter time period during which animals returned to the respective location. Thus, for conservation management, restricting non-lethal recreational activities and improving their management while limiting hunting pressure are crucial to minimise human impacts and preserve ecological integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03994
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hunting shapes wildlife behavioural responses to non-lethal recreational activities in a protected area

Anne L. Peters, Marco Heurich, Nicolas Ferry, Carsten F. Dormann
Global Ecology and Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Hunting shapes wildlife behavioural responses to non-lethal recreational activities in a protected area

Anne L. Peters, Marco Heurich, Nicolas Ferry, Carsten F. Dormann
article en

Abstract

Hunting and non-lethal recreational activities are often conducted in the same or neighbouring areas of natural environments, and both trigger responses in wildlife that resemble anti-predator behaviour. A limited amount of research has assessed the combined effects of non-lethal human activities and hunting on non-target species, although understanding these effects is crucial for wildlife conservation and protected area management. This study examined the effects of different recreation and hunting intensities on the probability of detecting red deer ( Cervus elaphus ), roe deer ( Capreolus capreolus ), wild boar ( Sus scrofa ), red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) and Eurasian lynx ( Lynx lynx ). Data were collected from 61 pairs of camera traps placed in the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany, with one camera from the pair placed on a trail and the other at a nearby location within the forest. Recurrent event analysis was used to estimate the temporal dynamics of the wildlife event rate within 24 h following a recreation event. Increased hunting intensity led to a significantly increasing avoidance of recreational activities by all species, independent of whether they were subjected to hunting or not (estimate −0.009 – 0.012, depending on species and camera placement). Proximity to recreational activities impacted the spatio-temporal interactions between wildlife and recreationists, with higher levels of recreation leading to a shorter time period during which animals returned to the respective location. Thus, for conservation management, restricting non-lethal recreational activities and improving their management while limiting hunting pressure are crucial to minimise human impacts and preserve ecological integrity.

Global Ecology and ConservationVol. 64
University of Freiburg (DE), Bavarian Forest National Park (DE), University of Inland Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.