The interactive effect of bone density and drill type on heat generated during drilling of dental implant osteotomy: a single versus sequential drills in vitro experiment

Drilling an implant osteotomy involves bone removal using specific drill designs, under irrigation, and at controlled speeds and forces. The interaction among these parameters generates heat that may impair bone viability, potentially resulting in fibrous encapsulation and osseointegration failure. This study aimed to evaluate the amount of heat produced during osteotomy preparation using a single-drill protocol compared with conventional sequential drilling in artificial bone blocks of varying densities. A total of 240 osteotomies were prepared in polyurethane blocks simulating D1–D4 bone types. For each density, 30 osteotomies were created using a single drill (4 mm × 15 mm) and 30 using conventional sequential drills, totalling 120 per protocol. A K-type thermocouple was positioned 1 mm from the final osteotomy wall to record bone temperature immediately after drilling. Data were analysed using a two-way ANOVA to assess the effects of bone density and drill type on temperature rise, with normality and homogeneity verified using the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests. In D1 and D2 bone types, single drills produced lower mean temperatures (25.2 ± 0.65 °C; 22.9 ± 0.56 °C) than conventional drills (26.3 ± 0.85 °C; 24.2 ± 0.44 °C). Conversely, in D3 and D4 bone types, single drills generated slightly higher temperatures (24.7 ± 0.47 °C; 24.5 ± 0.72 °C) than conventional drilling (23.5 ± 0.65 °C; 23.4 ± 0.79 °C). ANOVA revealed a significant effect of bone density (F = 129.62, p < 0.001) and a density–drill interaction (F = 69.03, p < 0.001), but no main effect of drill type (p = 0.776). Within the limitations of this study, single-drill osteotomy generated less heat in dense bone (D1–D2) but more in softer bone (D3–D4), suggesting that bone density modulates the thermal response during implant site preparation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-07377-1
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The interactive effect of bone density and drill type on heat generated during drilling of dental implant osteotomy: a single versus sequential drills in vitro experiment

Ramy Elmoazen, Maher Abdullatif Walid, Mohamed Ahmed Alkhodary, Rayan AlMohammadi et al.
BMC Oral Health
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

The interactive effect of bone density and drill type on heat generated during drilling of dental implant osteotomy: a single versus sequential drills in vitro experiment

Ramy Elmoazen, Maher Abdullatif Walid, Mohamed Ahmed Alkhodary, Rayan AlMohammadi, Mohammed AlTurayef
article en

Abstract

Drilling an implant osteotomy involves bone removal using specific drill designs, under irrigation, and at controlled speeds and forces. The interaction among these parameters generates heat that may impair bone viability, potentially resulting in fibrous encapsulation and osseointegration failure. This study aimed to evaluate the amount of heat produced during osteotomy preparation using a single-drill protocol compared with conventional sequential drilling in artificial bone blocks of varying densities. A total of 240 osteotomies were prepared in polyurethane blocks simulating D1–D4 bone types. For each density, 30 osteotomies were created using a single drill (4 mm × 15 mm) and 30 using conventional sequential drills, totalling 120 per protocol. A K-type thermocouple was positioned 1 mm from the final osteotomy wall to record bone temperature immediately after drilling. Data were analysed using a two-way ANOVA to assess the effects of bone density and drill type on temperature rise, with normality and homogeneity verified using the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests. In D1 and D2 bone types, single drills produced lower mean temperatures (25.2 ± 0.65 °C; 22.9 ± 0.56 °C) than conventional drills (26.3 ± 0.85 °C; 24.2 ± 0.44 °C). Conversely, in D3 and D4 bone types, single drills generated slightly higher temperatures (24.7 ± 0.47 °C; 24.5 ± 0.72 °C) than conventional drilling (23.5 ± 0.65 °C; 23.4 ± 0.79 °C). ANOVA revealed a significant effect of bone density (F = 129.62, p < 0.001) and a density–drill interaction (F = 69.03, p < 0.001), but no main effect of drill type (p = 0.776). Within the limitations of this study, single-drill osteotomy generated less heat in dense bone (D1–D2) but more in softer bone (D3–D4), suggesting that bone density modulates the thermal response during implant site preparation.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Qassim University (SA), University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.