Is there a difference in the postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia between erector spinae and serratus anterior plane blocks following modified radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled study

The postoperative recovery quality of patients may be associated with the efficacy of perioperative analgesia management. The effects of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) on the quality of recovery following breast cancer surgery have not been clearly established. The objective of the present study is to assess the quality of recovery and analgesic efficiency of ESPB and SAPB as postoperative analgesia methods in modified radical mastectomy surgeries. A total of 68 female patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomly separated into two groups. The main outcome of this randomized, double-blind prospective study was the 40-item global quality of recovery (QoR-40) questionnaire score, collected at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. Other measures of interest included postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS), cumulative opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request, demographic data, hemodynamic variables and postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting and dizziness. In the postoperative period after 24 h, the global QoR-40 scores were found as 185.5 (range:150–199) in the ESPB group and 186 (range:158–198) in the SAPB group (p = 0.304). The median time to first analgesic request was 645 min (range:30–740) in the ESPB group and 640 min (range:30–700) in the SAPB group, without any statistical variation between the groups (p = 0.216). Cumulative opioid consumption did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.785). Likewise, no significant difference was detected between the ESPB and SAPB groups in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, SpO₂ levels or complication rates. Preoperative administration of ESPB and SAPB in breast cancer surgery improved the quality of recovery and effectively reduced analgesic requirement. Future studies should investigate how local anesthetic type and volume affect postoperative recovery and analgesia. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04296188 on 03/03/2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03477-1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is there a difference in the postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia between erector spinae and serratus anterior plane blocks following modified radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled study

Mustafa Süren, Vildan Kölükçü, Ali Genç, Ahmet Tuğrul Şahin et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Is there a difference in the postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia between erector spinae and serratus anterior plane blocks following modified radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled study

Mustafa Süren, Vildan Kölükçü, Ali Genç, Ahmet Tuğrul Şahin, Mehtap Gürler Balta, İsmail Okan
article en

Abstract

The postoperative recovery quality of patients may be associated with the efficacy of perioperative analgesia management. The effects of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) on the quality of recovery following breast cancer surgery have not been clearly established. The objective of the present study is to assess the quality of recovery and analgesic efficiency of ESPB and SAPB as postoperative analgesia methods in modified radical mastectomy surgeries. A total of 68 female patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomly separated into two groups. The main outcome of this randomized, double-blind prospective study was the 40-item global quality of recovery (QoR-40) questionnaire score, collected at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. Other measures of interest included postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS), cumulative opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request, demographic data, hemodynamic variables and postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting and dizziness. In the postoperative period after 24 h, the global QoR-40 scores were found as 185.5 (range:150–199) in the ESPB group and 186 (range:158–198) in the SAPB group (p = 0.304). The median time to first analgesic request was 645 min (range:30–740) in the ESPB group and 640 min (range:30–700) in the SAPB group, without any statistical variation between the groups (p = 0.216). Cumulative opioid consumption did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.785). Likewise, no significant difference was detected between the ESPB and SAPB groups in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, SpO₂ levels or complication rates. Preoperative administration of ESPB and SAPB in breast cancer surgery improved the quality of recovery and effectively reduced analgesic requirement. Future studies should investigate how local anesthetic type and volume affect postoperative recovery and analgesia. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04296188 on 03/03/2020.

BMC AnesthesiologyVol. 25(1)
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR), Samsun University (TR), Istanbul Medeniyet University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.