Differentiating Taste Perception Between Pre-diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparative Analysis

Introduction Taste perception influences food choices and may contribute to the development and progression of metabolic disorders. Altered taste sensitivity has been reported in individuals with impaired glucose regulation, but comparative data across stages of dysglycemia remain limited. The present study aimed to compare taste sensitivity for sweet, sour, salty, and bitter modalities among healthy controls, pre-diabetic individuals, and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted in 45 participants divided into three groups: healthy controls (n = 15), pre-diabetics (n = 15), and T2DM subjects (n = 15). Taste thresholds were assessed using standardized solutions of sucrose (sweet), citric acid (sour), sodium chloride (salty), and quinine hydrochloride (bitter). Data were analyzed using ANOVA to compare taste thresholds across groups and Pearson correlation to evaluate associations with HbA1c levels. Results Sensitivities to sweet and sour tastes decreased significantly from controls to pre-diabetic and T2DM participants (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for salty or bitter taste sensitivity (p > 0.05). Higher HbA1c levels showed strong negative correlations with sweet (r = -0.89) and sour (r = -0.85) taste sensitivity (p < 0.001). Conclusions Sweet and sour taste perception declines progressively with worsening glycemic status. Taste testing may serve as a simple, non-invasive adjunct tool for the early detection of dysglycemia and for individualized dietary counseling in diabetes management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98045
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiating Taste Perception Between Pre-diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparative Analysis

Gregory R. Monteith, S. Kho oacute r, Amurtham Veeramani, Abirami Moorthy et al.
Cureus
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
article

Differentiating Taste Perception Between Pre-diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparative Analysis

Gregory R. Monteith, S. Kho oacute r, Amurtham Veeramani, Abirami Moorthy, Nelson P.J., Saravanan Thalaimalai
article en

Abstract

Introduction Taste perception influences food choices and may contribute to the development and progression of metabolic disorders. Altered taste sensitivity has been reported in individuals with impaired glucose regulation, but comparative data across stages of dysglycemia remain limited. The present study aimed to compare taste sensitivity for sweet, sour, salty, and bitter modalities among healthy controls, pre-diabetic individuals, and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted in 45 participants divided into three groups: healthy controls (n = 15), pre-diabetics (n = 15), and T2DM subjects (n = 15). Taste thresholds were assessed using standardized solutions of sucrose (sweet), citric acid (sour), sodium chloride (salty), and quinine hydrochloride (bitter). Data were analyzed using ANOVA to compare taste thresholds across groups and Pearson correlation to evaluate associations with HbA1c levels. Results Sensitivities to sweet and sour tastes decreased significantly from controls to pre-diabetic and T2DM participants (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for salty or bitter taste sensitivity (p > 0.05). Higher HbA1c levels showed strong negative correlations with sweet (r = -0.89) and sour (r = -0.85) taste sensitivity (p < 0.001). Conclusions Sweet and sour taste perception declines progressively with worsening glycemic status. Taste testing may serve as a simple, non-invasive adjunct tool for the early detection of dysglycemia and for individualized dietary counseling in diabetes management.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Karpagam Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.