Reducing Golden Hour Admission Times for Extremely Preterm Infants: An Improvement Science Initiative

The Golden Hour is the first 60 minutes of life for extremely preterm infants and represents a critical window where timely stabilization can reduce morbidity such as intraventricular hemorrhage and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. At the University of Virginia, average Golden Hour admission times for infants <28 weeks' gestation were 117 minutes, indicating a major opportunity for improvement. This study aimed to reduce admission time by 25% (to ≤87 min) for infants <28 weeks' gestational age within 1 year of implementation.Using the Institution for Healthcare Improvement methodology, a multidisciplinary team identified key drivers of delay and implemented two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. PDSA 1 introduced a designated admission coordinator, structured flowsheet, and visible timer to enhance team awareness. PDSA 2 focused on line-placement efficiency, adding an auditory time, team huddles after 15 minutes, and earlier isolette closure to promote thermoregulation. Statistical process control (SPC) charts (XbarS, XmR) were used to evaluate changes. The outcome measure was time from admission to isolette closure. Process measures were time to glucose, IV dextrose, X-ray, and surfactant administration. Balancing measures were admission temperature, glucose levels, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) rates.Among 106 infants, the average admission time decreased from 117 to 59 minutes, resulting in a 50% reduction. The proportion of admissions meeting the SMART aim (<87 min) improved from 8 to 100%. Process variability decreased on both XbarS and XmR charts. Balancing measures remained stable.Two sequential PDSA cycles achieved and sustained a 50% reduction in Golden Hour admission time without adverse effects. Structured team roles, real-time feedback, and workflow redesign produced a more efficient and stable process. This initiative demonstrates that systematic QI can meaningfully optimize Golden Hour care and may be replicable across NICUs. · This is the first reported quality improvement initiative to use admission time as a primary outcome within the neonatal Golden Hour framework.. · The results show a significant and sustained 50% reduction in admission time-from 117 minutes to 59 minutes-exceeding the SMART aim.. · Key drivers of change included defined team roles, visual and auditory cues, and standardization of the umbilical line placement workflow, which can be readily adapted for use in other NICUs seeking to test improvements during Golden Hour admissions..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2750-9287
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing Golden Hour Admission Times for Extremely Preterm Infants: An Improvement Science Initiative

Nicholas M. Heitkamp, Jonathan R. Swanson, Sarah Lepore, Megan Elliott et al.
American Journal of Perinatology
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Reducing Golden Hour Admission Times for Extremely Preterm Infants: An Improvement Science Initiative

Nicholas M. Heitkamp, Jonathan R. Swanson, Sarah Lepore, Megan Elliott, Jaclyn B. Wiggins, Hannah Fox, Santina Zanelli
article en

Abstract

The Golden Hour is the first 60 minutes of life for extremely preterm infants and represents a critical window where timely stabilization can reduce morbidity such as intraventricular hemorrhage and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. At the University of Virginia, average Golden Hour admission times for infants <28 weeks' gestation were 117 minutes, indicating a major opportunity for improvement. This study aimed to reduce admission time by 25% (to ≤87 min) for infants <28 weeks' gestational age within 1 year of implementation.Using the Institution for Healthcare Improvement methodology, a multidisciplinary team identified key drivers of delay and implemented two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. PDSA 1 introduced a designated admission coordinator, structured flowsheet, and visible timer to enhance team awareness. PDSA 2 focused on line-placement efficiency, adding an auditory time, team huddles after 15 minutes, and earlier isolette closure to promote thermoregulation. Statistical process control (SPC) charts (XbarS, XmR) were used to evaluate changes. The outcome measure was time from admission to isolette closure. Process measures were time to glucose, IV dextrose, X-ray, and surfactant administration. Balancing measures were admission temperature, glucose levels, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) rates.Among 106 infants, the average admission time decreased from 117 to 59 minutes, resulting in a 50% reduction. The proportion of admissions meeting the SMART aim (<87 min) improved from 8 to 100%. Process variability decreased on both XbarS and XmR charts. Balancing measures remained stable.Two sequential PDSA cycles achieved and sustained a 50% reduction in Golden Hour admission time without adverse effects. Structured team roles, real-time feedback, and workflow redesign produced a more efficient and stable process. This initiative demonstrates that systematic QI can meaningfully optimize Golden Hour care and may be replicable across NICUs. · This is the first reported quality improvement initiative to use admission time as a primary outcome within the neonatal Golden Hour framework.. · The results show a significant and sustained 50% reduction in admission time-from 117 minutes to 59 minutes-exceeding the SMART aim.. · Key drivers of change included defined team roles, visual and auditory cues, and standardization of the umbilical line placement workflow, which can be readily adapted for use in other NICUs seeking to test improvements during Golden Hour admissions..

American Journal of Perinatology
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.