Five-Year Outcomes of Omidenepag Isopropyl Monotherapy for Untreated Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Background Omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) eye drops are newly developed for glaucoma treatment. OMDI is a non-prostaglandin EP2 agonist with a mechanism of action distinct from other commonly used drugs, such as prostaglandin FP agonists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of OMDI administered as first-line therapy for untreated primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) over five years. Methods This retrospective study included one eye per patient. A total of 103 treatment-naïve, consecutive POAG eyes newly administered OMDI between December 2018 and March 2020 were included. Reasons for discontinuing OMDI due to adverse effects or other factors were analyzed. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) over time, and secondary outcomes were visual field progression and rate of persistence with OMDI monotherapy. Pre- and posttreatment IOP and mean deviation (MD) in Humphrey visual field testing were analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the persistence of OMDI monotherapy. Results Among 103 initial eyes, 13 cases were discontinued early (up to six months) due to adverse events (e.g., conjunctival hyperemia), and nine cases were lost to follow-up (e.g., transferred to another institution). In the remaining 81 eyes, over the five-year follow-up, 20 eyes (25%, 20/81) required additional glaucoma medications due to inadequate efficacy associated with visual field progression or structural changes. Two eyes underwent cataract surgery (one eye cataract surgery alone, one eye combined cataract surgery and microhook trabeculotomy). Median (IQR) IOP decreased significantly from baseline to one, two, three, four, and five years: 17 (15.5-18.5), 15 (13-16), 14 (13-15), 14 (13-16), 15 (13-16), and 14 (13-16) mmHg, respectively (p = 0.008, mixed-effects model). Five years after initiating OMDI, monotherapy remained feasible in 73% of cases (59/81). The visual field of these 59 eyes under OMDI monotherapy changed from -1.47 (-0.48 to -2.48) dB at baseline to -0.94 (-0.34 to -3.15) dB at five years, with no significant change in MD values (p = 0.34, mixed-effects model). No cases discontinued OMDI due to adverse events such as allergies after six months of treatment. Conclusions OMDI achieved sustained IOP reduction and demonstrated good tolerability over five years. This retrospective study suggests that OMDI may be a reliable first-line treatment option for glaucoma. These findings require confirmation in prospective multicenter trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98038
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Five-Year Outcomes of Omidenepag Isopropyl Monotherapy for Untreated Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Norio Kanamori, Akiyasu Kanamori
Cureus
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Five-Year Outcomes of Omidenepag Isopropyl Monotherapy for Untreated Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Norio Kanamori, Akiyasu Kanamori
article en

Abstract

Background Omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) eye drops are newly developed for glaucoma treatment. OMDI is a non-prostaglandin EP2 agonist with a mechanism of action distinct from other commonly used drugs, such as prostaglandin FP agonists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of OMDI administered as first-line therapy for untreated primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) over five years. Methods This retrospective study included one eye per patient. A total of 103 treatment-naïve, consecutive POAG eyes newly administered OMDI between December 2018 and March 2020 were included. Reasons for discontinuing OMDI due to adverse effects or other factors were analyzed. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) over time, and secondary outcomes were visual field progression and rate of persistence with OMDI monotherapy. Pre- and posttreatment IOP and mean deviation (MD) in Humphrey visual field testing were analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the persistence of OMDI monotherapy. Results Among 103 initial eyes, 13 cases were discontinued early (up to six months) due to adverse events (e.g., conjunctival hyperemia), and nine cases were lost to follow-up (e.g., transferred to another institution). In the remaining 81 eyes, over the five-year follow-up, 20 eyes (25%, 20/81) required additional glaucoma medications due to inadequate efficacy associated with visual field progression or structural changes. Two eyes underwent cataract surgery (one eye cataract surgery alone, one eye combined cataract surgery and microhook trabeculotomy). Median (IQR) IOP decreased significantly from baseline to one, two, three, four, and five years: 17 (15.5-18.5), 15 (13-16), 14 (13-15), 14 (13-16), 15 (13-16), and 14 (13-16) mmHg, respectively (p = 0.008, mixed-effects model). Five years after initiating OMDI, monotherapy remained feasible in 73% of cases (59/81). The visual field of these 59 eyes under OMDI monotherapy changed from -1.47 (-0.48 to -2.48) dB at baseline to -0.94 (-0.34 to -3.15) dB at five years, with no significant change in MD values (p = 0.34, mixed-effects model). No cases discontinued OMDI due to adverse events such as allergies after six months of treatment. Conclusions OMDI achieved sustained IOP reduction and demonstrated good tolerability over five years. This retrospective study suggests that OMDI may be a reliable first-line treatment option for glaucoma. These findings require confirmation in prospective multicenter trials.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Kobe University Hospital (JP), Akebono Clinic (JP), Kobe University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.