Exploring the impact of a training program for continuing education facilitators—an empirical journey

Introduction This study assesses an andragogical teaching model, INSPIRA, deployed in continuing education (CE) programs at a private university in Mexico. Workshops have been conducted to train CE facilitators (instructors) on this model, which was first implemented in 2016. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these teaching model workshops and to identify areas for improvement based on facilitators’ perceptions, drawing on the theories of competency development and job satisfaction. Methods A mixed-methods approach was utilized, incorporating historical data, surveys, and focus groups. Historical data were gathered from institutional records, including teaching evaluations for 536 facilitators conducted both before and after their training on the teaching model. From this group, 158 facilitators completed a researcher-developed survey assessing the impact of the training. Furthermore, two focus groups were held with 16 facilitators in total. Results The results indicated a statistically significant enhancement in teaching evaluations following the training, with mean evaluation scores increasing by 0.82 points on a 10-point scale ( p ≤ 0.001). More than 60% of facilitators reported improvements in teaching clarity, relevance, and practicality. Approximately 65% expressed that the topic became more applicable to their work, while only 30% observed increases in visibility, recognition, or income. Qualitative feedback indicated that facilitators appreciated the model’s clarity, structure, and focus, but suggested that workshops should be tailored to specific continuing education programs, supplemented with ongoing support, and regularly updated. Discussion In conclusion, the workshops effectively improved facilitators’ teaching competency. However, there is a need to enhance the components of job satisfaction. Significant increases in teaching evaluations are associated with facilitators’ improvements in structuring sessions, applying adult learning principles, and using technology, boosting their confidence and professional identity. However, these benefits didn’t always lead to recognition or income, requiring institutional support. Tailoring workshops to different modalities and providing certifications could further enhance implementation and facilitator engagement. The reliance on self-reported data and the study’s singular institutional context limit the applicability of its findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1601508
Primary Topic
Adult and Continuing Education Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the impact of a training program for continuing education facilitators—an empirical journey

Patricia Vázquez‐Villegas, José Noé Miranda-Becerra, Irma del Carmen Torres Mata
Frontiers in Education
Adult and Continuing Education Topics
article

Exploring the impact of a training program for continuing education facilitators—an empirical journey

Patricia Vázquez‐Villegas, José Noé Miranda-Becerra, Irma del Carmen Torres Mata
article en

Abstract

Introduction This study assesses an andragogical teaching model, INSPIRA, deployed in continuing education (CE) programs at a private university in Mexico. Workshops have been conducted to train CE facilitators (instructors) on this model, which was first implemented in 2016. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these teaching model workshops and to identify areas for improvement based on facilitators’ perceptions, drawing on the theories of competency development and job satisfaction. Methods A mixed-methods approach was utilized, incorporating historical data, surveys, and focus groups. Historical data were gathered from institutional records, including teaching evaluations for 536 facilitators conducted both before and after their training on the teaching model. From this group, 158 facilitators completed a researcher-developed survey assessing the impact of the training. Furthermore, two focus groups were held with 16 facilitators in total. Results The results indicated a statistically significant enhancement in teaching evaluations following the training, with mean evaluation scores increasing by 0.82 points on a 10-point scale ( p ≤ 0.001). More than 60% of facilitators reported improvements in teaching clarity, relevance, and practicality. Approximately 65% expressed that the topic became more applicable to their work, while only 30% observed increases in visibility, recognition, or income. Qualitative feedback indicated that facilitators appreciated the model’s clarity, structure, and focus, but suggested that workshops should be tailored to specific continuing education programs, supplemented with ongoing support, and regularly updated. Discussion In conclusion, the workshops effectively improved facilitators’ teaching competency. However, there is a need to enhance the components of job satisfaction. Significant increases in teaching evaluations are associated with facilitators’ improvements in structuring sessions, applying adult learning principles, and using technology, boosting their confidence and professional identity. However, these benefits didn’t always lead to recognition or income, requiring institutional support. Tailoring workshops to different modalities and providing certifications could further enhance implementation and facilitator engagement. The reliance on self-reported data and the study’s singular institutional context limit the applicability of its findings.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Institute for the Future (US), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Adult and Continuing Education Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.