Broadcasting LGBT+ support: the scope and limitations of presenting allyship

Purpose Advance knowledge about LGBT+ allies, their role and contribution, and how they voice support. Design/methodology/approach The research is based on an innovative video booth methodology capturing short video messages recorded by LGBT+ allies. A video booth is like a passport photo booth with an affixed tablet for video recording. The booth was placed in eight organisations during LGBT+ history month, inviting people to talk about their working lives and experiences of LGBT+ networks. Findings Due to sensitivities around identification, the findings are presented in the form of composite narratives of fictionalised characters composed by the researchers. Four versions of support were voiced by LGBT+ allies: “the proud ally”, “corporate scripting”, “professional/personal journey” and “pointing at others”. Employing Goffman's theory on presentation of self and scholarship on impression management, we illustrate how support is performed for the public and in public, using innovative data and methods of presenting it back to the public. Originality/value The article expands scholarship on LGBT+ allies by explaining the scope and limits of voicing, and potentially actioning, support. It also illustrates the value of using composite narratives when researching sensitive topics in management and/or organisations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qrom-11-2024-2871
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Broadcasting LGBT+ support: the scope and limitations of presenting allyship

Karen Mumford, Anna Einarsdóttir, Sudthasiri Siriviriyakul
Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Broadcasting LGBT+ support: the scope and limitations of presenting allyship

Karen Mumford, Anna Einarsdóttir, Sudthasiri Siriviriyakul
article en

Abstract

Purpose Advance knowledge about LGBT+ allies, their role and contribution, and how they voice support. Design/methodology/approach The research is based on an innovative video booth methodology capturing short video messages recorded by LGBT+ allies. A video booth is like a passport photo booth with an affixed tablet for video recording. The booth was placed in eight organisations during LGBT+ history month, inviting people to talk about their working lives and experiences of LGBT+ networks. Findings Due to sensitivities around identification, the findings are presented in the form of composite narratives of fictionalised characters composed by the researchers. Four versions of support were voiced by LGBT+ allies: “the proud ally”, “corporate scripting”, “professional/personal journey” and “pointing at others”. Employing Goffman's theory on presentation of self and scholarship on impression management, we illustrate how support is performed for the public and in public, using innovative data and methods of presenting it back to the public. Originality/value The article expands scholarship on LGBT+ allies by explaining the scope and limits of voicing, and potentially actioning, support. It also illustrates the value of using composite narratives when researching sensitive topics in management and/or organisations.

Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International JournalVol. 21(1)
Thammasat University (TH), Japan Society (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Broadcasting LGBT+ support: the scope and limitations of presenting allyship — Karen Mumford, Anna Einarsdóttir, et al. · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS