The 'Mental Health Crisis' and the Nonbeing of the Mad

This article offers a critical theoretical analysis of the ontological dimension of madness, challenging dominant narratives that frame contemporary mental health discourse as a 'crisis'. Rather than focusing on the neoliberal or economic conditions under which this crisis is declared, we interrogate the symbolic and ontological structures that delineate who is considered sane and who is constructed ased mad. Our central claim is that Western symbolic systems produce categories of unintelligibility; that is, 'non-beings' who are excluded from the domain of being human. These classificatory binaries (human/nonhuman, rational/irrational, sane/insane) are not neutral descriptors, but constitutive symbolic orders that shape the very possibility of human relations. Drawing on Judith Butler's theory of subject formation, we argue that the subject emerges only through normative language into which one is born, not chosen. This entry into the speakable requires differentiation from the unspeakable, echoing Descartes's foundational opposition between reason and madness. Madness in this schema is not merely a factor of exclusion, but functions as the necessary condition for defining rational subjectivity. The unintelligible subject, foreclosed from language, inhabits what Julia Kristeva terms the realm of the abject: a space of exclusion that is continually reproduced through performative acts of subject formation. This ontological foreclosure is not a historical anomaly, but a persistent feature of Western philosophical thought. By exposing how symbolic violence is embedded in the very structures that define subjectivity, we argue that the violence against those deemed mad is not incidental but systemic. The article concludes that efforts to 'humanise' the psychiatric and criminal justice systems are moot if they do not disrupt the root cause of the problem: that Mad persons-similar to Black, Indigenous, Trans, and Queer persons, among others-are not considered worthy of humanity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Philosophy
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70055
Primary Topic
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The 'Mental Health Crisis' and the Nonbeing of the Mad

Jean‐Laurent Domingue, Thomas Foth
Nursing Philosophy
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
article

The 'Mental Health Crisis' and the Nonbeing of the Mad

Jean‐Laurent Domingue, Thomas Foth
article en

Abstract

This article offers a critical theoretical analysis of the ontological dimension of madness, challenging dominant narratives that frame contemporary mental health discourse as a 'crisis'. Rather than focusing on the neoliberal or economic conditions under which this crisis is declared, we interrogate the symbolic and ontological structures that delineate who is considered sane and who is constructed ased mad. Our central claim is that Western symbolic systems produce categories of unintelligibility; that is, 'non-beings' who are excluded from the domain of being human. These classificatory binaries (human/nonhuman, rational/irrational, sane/insane) are not neutral descriptors, but constitutive symbolic orders that shape the very possibility of human relations. Drawing on Judith Butler's theory of subject formation, we argue that the subject emerges only through normative language into which one is born, not chosen. This entry into the speakable requires differentiation from the unspeakable, echoing Descartes's foundational opposition between reason and madness. Madness in this schema is not merely a factor of exclusion, but functions as the necessary condition for defining rational subjectivity. The unintelligible subject, foreclosed from language, inhabits what Julia Kristeva terms the realm of the abject: a space of exclusion that is continually reproduced through performative acts of subject formation. This ontological foreclosure is not a historical anomaly, but a persistent feature of Western philosophical thought. By exposing how symbolic violence is embedded in the very structures that define subjectivity, we argue that the violence against those deemed mad is not incidental but systemic. The article concludes that efforts to 'humanise' the psychiatric and criminal justice systems are moot if they do not disrupt the root cause of the problem: that Mad persons-similar to Black, Indigenous, Trans, and Queer persons, among others-are not considered worthy of humanity.

Nursing PhilosophyVol. 27(1)
University of Ottawa (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The 'Mental Health Crisis' and the Nonbeing of the Mad — Jean‐Laurent Domingue, Thomas Foth · Nursing Philosophy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS