Diagnostic Concordance Between Clinical and Histopathologic Diagnoses of Oral Mucosal Lesions: A Retrospective Study

Introduction Accurate diagnosis is essential for effective treatment and for determining the outcome of any pathologic condition. This study aimed to evaluate the concordance between the clinical and histopathologic diagnoses of biopsied soft-tissue specimens submitted to the Oral Pathology Biopsy Service at the University of Alberta over a 23-year period. Methods The clinical and histopathological diagnoses were coded using the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT). Subsequently, all the diagnoses were classified according to their pathogenesis. The outcome measurement was the percentage of absolute concordance, relative concordance, and discordance. Diagnostic agreement was evaluated using Cohen's kappa; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were calculated. Additionally, the relationship between gender, age, and pathogenic-cluster concordance was tested using the Chi-square test or the Sample t-test. Results The anonymized database comprised 18,935 oral soft-tissue biopsies. The absolute concordance by SNOMED-CT codes was 47.8%, and by synonyms, 52.1%. The relative concordance was 76.2%, and the discordance was 23.8%. The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis in detecting oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) was evaluated, yielding a sensitivity of 79.3%, a specificity of 97.9%, a PPV of 88.4%, and an NPV of 95.9%. Moreover, for malignant lesions, the clinical diagnosis demonstrated a sensitivity of 67.8%, a specificity of 98.5%, a PPV of 47.0%, and an NPV of 99.4%. Conclusions The results indicated that cluster concordance demonstrated substantial agreement. While clinical examination effectively identifies patients without malignancy or OPMD, it is not sufficiently sensitive to diagnose them. Therefore, histopathologic evaluation of biopsy specimens remains critical for achieving an accurate and definitive diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Concordance Between Clinical and Histopathologic Diagnoses of Oral Mucosal Lesions: A Retrospective Study

Pallavi Parashar, Masoud MiriMoghaddam, Hollis Lai, Patricia Hernandez-Rivera
1 citations
Cureus
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
1.47
article

Diagnostic Concordance Between Clinical and Histopathologic Diagnoses of Oral Mucosal Lesions: A Retrospective Study

Pallavi Parashar, Masoud MiriMoghaddam, Hollis Lai, Patricia Hernandez-Rivera
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Accurate diagnosis is essential for effective treatment and for determining the outcome of any pathologic condition. This study aimed to evaluate the concordance between the clinical and histopathologic diagnoses of biopsied soft-tissue specimens submitted to the Oral Pathology Biopsy Service at the University of Alberta over a 23-year period. Methods The clinical and histopathological diagnoses were coded using the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT). Subsequently, all the diagnoses were classified according to their pathogenesis. The outcome measurement was the percentage of absolute concordance, relative concordance, and discordance. Diagnostic agreement was evaluated using Cohen's kappa; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were calculated. Additionally, the relationship between gender, age, and pathogenic-cluster concordance was tested using the Chi-square test or the Sample t-test. Results The anonymized database comprised 18,935 oral soft-tissue biopsies. The absolute concordance by SNOMED-CT codes was 47.8%, and by synonyms, 52.1%. The relative concordance was 76.2%, and the discordance was 23.8%. The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis in detecting oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) was evaluated, yielding a sensitivity of 79.3%, a specificity of 97.9%, a PPV of 88.4%, and an NPV of 95.9%. Moreover, for malignant lesions, the clinical diagnosis demonstrated a sensitivity of 67.8%, a specificity of 98.5%, a PPV of 47.0%, and an NPV of 99.4%. Conclusions The results indicated that cluster concordance demonstrated substantial agreement. While clinical examination effectively identifies patients without malignancy or OPMD, it is not sufficiently sensitive to diagnose them. Therefore, histopathologic evaluation of biopsy specimens remains critical for achieving an accurate and definitive diagnosis.

CureusVol. 17(11)
University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.