Failure of Salvage in Prepectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center Cohort

Prepectoral breast reconstruction offers esthetic and recovery advantages but may be more vulnerable to complications due to the absence of muscular coverage. This study examined the clinical course of patients with failed prepectoral implant reconstruction. All consecutive prepectoral reconstructions performed between March 2017 and July 2022 at a single tertiary center were reviewed. Of 239 reconstructions, 42 (17.5%) ultimately failed, most commonly due to infection (50%). Sixteen patients (38%) underwent definitive reconstruction with a median interval of 379 days (IQR 249) from initial surgery to final reconstruction. The most common secondary reconstruction modalities were implant-based reconstruction (31%) and free-tissue transfer (31%). On multivariate analysis, increasing age, higher body mass index (BMI), and prior radiation were independently associated with implant loss. Failure of salvage after prepectoral reconstruction remains a major challenge and often results in delayed or abandoned reconstruction, highlighting the need for careful patient selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251405560
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure of Salvage in Prepectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center Cohort

Nolan S. Karp, Kshipra Hemal, Carter J. Boyd, Thomas J. Sorenson et al.
1 citations
The American Surgeon
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.01
article

Failure of Salvage in Prepectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center Cohort

Nolan S. Karp, Kshipra Hemal, Carter J. Boyd, Thomas J. Sorenson, Oriana Cohen, Mihye Choi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Prepectoral breast reconstruction offers esthetic and recovery advantages but may be more vulnerable to complications due to the absence of muscular coverage. This study examined the clinical course of patients with failed prepectoral implant reconstruction. All consecutive prepectoral reconstructions performed between March 2017 and July 2022 at a single tertiary center were reviewed. Of 239 reconstructions, 42 (17.5%) ultimately failed, most commonly due to infection (50%). Sixteen patients (38%) underwent definitive reconstruction with a median interval of 379 days (IQR 249) from initial surgery to final reconstruction. The most common secondary reconstruction modalities were implant-based reconstruction (31%) and free-tissue transfer (31%). On multivariate analysis, increasing age, higher body mass index (BMI), and prior radiation were independently associated with implant loss. Failure of salvage after prepectoral reconstruction remains a major challenge and often results in delayed or abandoned reconstruction, highlighting the need for careful patient selection.

The American Surgeon
New York University Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.