Atogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies failure in migraine: a multicenter real-world study of effectiveness, safety, persistence and predictors of response

Atogepant is approved for migraine prevention and has shown strong efficacy in clinical trials. However, its effectiveness following failure of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) has not been evaluated in large real-world populations. This multicenter observational study conducted across Spanish headache units included adults with migraine who initiated atogepant after failure of ≥ 1 anti-CGRP MAb and had ≥ 3 months of follow-up. Baseline demographic and clinical variables were collected prospectively, with follow-up assessments at months 3 and 6. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) at three months. Secondary outcomes included ≥ 30%, ≥ 75%, and 100% response rates; changes in headache days, pain intensity, acute medication use, and patient-reported outcomes; adverse events; treatment persistence; and factors associated with response. A total of 252 patients were included (mean age 48.9 ± 12 years; 83.3% female; 80.6% with chronic migraine; 45.6% with continuous daily headache). Prior to atogepant, 39.7% had failed one anti-CGRP MAb, 27.0% two, 20.2% three, and 13.1% four. Median baseline MMD was 16, monthly headache days 27, and acute medication days 20. At 3 months, 44.4% achieved a ≥ 30% reduction in MMD, 29.7% ≥50%, and 11.7% ≥75%. Adverse events were reported in 52.5% of patients, most commonly constipation (30%) and nausea (25%). At three months, 26.2% had discontinued treatment (65.1% due to inefficacy, 28.8% due to intolerance). Treatment persistence at 180 days was 61% (95% CI 54 to 69%). A higher number of previously failed MAbs was independently associated with reduced odds of ≥ 50% response (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97). Moreover, a higher number of previously failed MAbs was associated with diminished improvements across multiple clinical endpoints, including headache frequency, intensity, acute medication use, and disability measures. Atogepant may represent a viable treatment option for patients with migraine who have failed anti-CGRP MAbs. In this large real-world cohort, approximately one-third of patients achieved a ≥ 50% response, despite a treatment-refractory profile. However, the likelihood of response decreases with a higher number of previously failed MAbs, and mild adverse events are frequent. This is the largest real-world study to date evaluating atogepant after failure of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine, including a highly refractory multicenter cohort. Atogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies failure achieved a ≥ 50% response in 29.7% of patients and a ≥ 30% response in 44.4% at 3 months, with mild adverse effects reported in over half of cases. A higher number of previously failed MAbs, trigeminoautonomic symptoms, and depression were independently associated with lower likelihood of response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02239-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies failure in migraine: a multicenter real-world study of effectiveness, safety, persistence and predictors of response

Alicia González‐Martínez, Ane Mínguez‐Olaondo, Sonia Santos Lasaosa, A. López-Bravo et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Migraine and Headache Studies
1.47
article

Atogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies failure in migraine: a multicenter real-world study of effectiveness, safety, persistence and predictors of response

Alicia González‐Martínez, Ane Mínguez‐Olaondo, Sonia Santos Lasaosa, A. López-Bravo, David García‐Azorín, Mariano Huerta Villanueva, N. Morollón Sánchez-Mateos, Alicia Alpuente, N. González-García, Antonio Sánchez‐Soblechero, Javier Casas‐Limón, Ángel L. Guerrero, Patricia Pozo‐Rosich, Jaume Campdelacreu, Sonia María García Sánchez, Yésica González Osorio, Albert Muñoz‐Vendrell, Almudena Layos-Romero, Marta Torres‐Ferrús, Ana Beatriz Gago‐Veiga, Javier Díaz de Terán, Alberto Andrés López, Edoardo Caronna, Iris Fernández-Lázaro, Luis Miguel Cano Sánchez, Alberto Lozano Ros, R. Belvís, C G Pantoja Hernández, Paloma Valín‐Villanueva, Leonardo Portocarrero-Sánchez, Sergio Campoy-Díaz, Alba Pérez-de-la-parte
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Atogepant is approved for migraine prevention and has shown strong efficacy in clinical trials. However, its effectiveness following failure of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) has not been evaluated in large real-world populations. This multicenter observational study conducted across Spanish headache units included adults with migraine who initiated atogepant after failure of ≥ 1 anti-CGRP MAb and had ≥ 3 months of follow-up. Baseline demographic and clinical variables were collected prospectively, with follow-up assessments at months 3 and 6. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) at three months. Secondary outcomes included ≥ 30%, ≥ 75%, and 100% response rates; changes in headache days, pain intensity, acute medication use, and patient-reported outcomes; adverse events; treatment persistence; and factors associated with response. A total of 252 patients were included (mean age 48.9 ± 12 years; 83.3% female; 80.6% with chronic migraine; 45.6% with continuous daily headache). Prior to atogepant, 39.7% had failed one anti-CGRP MAb, 27.0% two, 20.2% three, and 13.1% four. Median baseline MMD was 16, monthly headache days 27, and acute medication days 20. At 3 months, 44.4% achieved a ≥ 30% reduction in MMD, 29.7% ≥50%, and 11.7% ≥75%. Adverse events were reported in 52.5% of patients, most commonly constipation (30%) and nausea (25%). At three months, 26.2% had discontinued treatment (65.1% due to inefficacy, 28.8% due to intolerance). Treatment persistence at 180 days was 61% (95% CI 54 to 69%). A higher number of previously failed MAbs was independently associated with reduced odds of ≥ 50% response (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97). Moreover, a higher number of previously failed MAbs was associated with diminished improvements across multiple clinical endpoints, including headache frequency, intensity, acute medication use, and disability measures. Atogepant may represent a viable treatment option for patients with migraine who have failed anti-CGRP MAbs. In this large real-world cohort, approximately one-third of patients achieved a ≥ 50% response, despite a treatment-refractory profile. However, the likelihood of response decreases with a higher number of previously failed MAbs, and mild adverse events are frequent. This is the largest real-world study to date evaluating atogepant after failure of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine, including a highly refractory multicenter cohort. Atogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies failure achieved a ≥ 50% response in 29.7% of patients and a ≥ 30% response in 44.4% at 3 months, with mild adverse effects reported in over half of cases. A higher number of previously failed MAbs, trigeminoautonomic symptoms, and depression were independently associated with lower likelihood of response.

The Journal of Headache and PainVol. 27(1)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Universidad de Deusto (ES), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Hospital Universitario de Canarias (ES), Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Bellvitge University Hospital (ES), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge (ES), Hospital de Viladecans (ES), Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute (ES), Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón (ES), Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (ES), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (ES), Donostiako Unibertsitate Ospitalea (ES), Onkologikoa (ES), Hospital General Universitario de Albacete (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid (ES), Hospital Universitario Río Hortega (ES), Consorci Sanitari Garraf (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Centres de Recerca de Catalunya, Generalitat de Catalunya
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Migraine and Headache Studies
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.