Intermittent Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations: Implications for Detection Effectiveness from Periodic Leak Detection Surveys

Effective mitigation of methane emissions from oil and gas (O&G) operations requires accurate detection strategies that reflect the true temporal characteristics of emissions. Regulatory leak detection and repair (LDAR) programs have traditionally assumed that methane leaks are persistent, which has supported the use of periodic inspections, such as optical gas imaging surveys and aerial overflights, as effective mitigation tools. However, many O&G facilities do not operate in a steady state, and substantial emissions can occur intermittently due to routine operational processes like well cycling and fluid handling. Using field observations from continuous monitoring systems (CMSs), we generate synthetic two-year time series to evaluate how quickly intermittent emissions would be detected by randomized periodic inspections conducted monthly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually. Our findings show that most intermittent emissions remain undetected during the first year of such inspections, regardless of survey frequency or duration. While CMSs do not detect emissions all of the time from all equipment due to operating constraints or environmental conditions, it is likely that they would detect emissions much more rapidly than periodic surveys. These results underscore the need to reconsider current LDAR paradigms and highlight the critical role of CMSs in reducing methane emissions more effectively and responsively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Air
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intermittent Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations: Implications for Detection Effectiveness from Periodic Leak Detection Surveys

Thomas McArthur, Daniel Zimmerle, Jason Bylsma, Alexander J. White et al.
2 citations
ACS ES&T Air
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
article

Intermittent Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations: Implications for Detection Effectiveness from Periodic Leak Detection Surveys

Thomas McArthur, Daniel Zimmerle, Jason Bylsma, Alexander J. White, Arthur Santos, Anna L. Hodshire, Caroline B. Alden, Gregory B. Rieker, Gerald P. Duggan, David Youngquist
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Effective mitigation of methane emissions from oil and gas (O&G) operations requires accurate detection strategies that reflect the true temporal characteristics of emissions. Regulatory leak detection and repair (LDAR) programs have traditionally assumed that methane leaks are persistent, which has supported the use of periodic inspections, such as optical gas imaging surveys and aerial overflights, as effective mitigation tools. However, many O&G facilities do not operate in a steady state, and substantial emissions can occur intermittently due to routine operational processes like well cycling and fluid handling. Using field observations from continuous monitoring systems (CMSs), we generate synthetic two-year time series to evaluate how quickly intermittent emissions would be detected by randomized periodic inspections conducted monthly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually. Our findings show that most intermittent emissions remain undetected during the first year of such inspections, regardless of survey frequency or duration. While CMSs do not detect emissions all of the time from all equipment due to operating constraints or environmental conditions, it is likely that they would detect emissions much more rapidly than periodic surveys. These results underscore the need to reconsider current LDAR paradigms and highlight the critical role of CMSs in reducing methane emissions more effectively and responsively.

ACS ES&T AirVol. 2(12)
Energy Institute (GB), Knowledge Unlatched (Germany) (DE), NewPath Research (US), Center for Systems Biology (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.