Analysis of decay heat in spent nuclear fuel using serpent 2 simulations and Clab measurements

This study compares measured and calculated decay heat values for spent nuclear fuel assemblies stored at Sweden’s Clab facility, an interim storage site where decay heat can be directly measured. The analysis utilizes measured values from two reports: one from the Svensk Kärnbränslehantering Aktiebolag (SKB, 2006) and another from the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI, 2024). A number of these measured values is present in both reports, possibly updated in the newer version. Burnup and decay calculations are performed using the Monte Carlo software Serpent 2 to accurately model the assemblies’ geometry and the respective reactors’ operating conditions. The impact of using two different sources of information on decay heat measurements is assessed through C/E (Calculations over Experiments) ratios for the selected fuel assemblies. The results indicate no statistical evidence that the re-evaluated estimates from the EPRI report differ significantly from the initial estimates in the SKB report. Furthermore, the study highlights that even small variations in moderator density can lead to significant changes in the final decay heat values. Finally, the study evaluates differences in C/E ratios across various fuel assembly types. Confidence intervals are estimated first at a general level, based on the reactor type, and then refined to account for specific fuel assembly characteristics. In general we found the 95% confidence interval for the C/E of a fuel assembly taken from EPRI report to range from 1.016 to 1.023, with a mean C/E of 1.019. • Comparison between measurements from Clab facility and Serpent 2 simulations. • A total of 270 measurements for EPRI report were compared to Serpent 2 simulations. • A total of 109 measurements for SKB were compared to Serpent 2 simulations. • Two different nuclear data libraries were used (ENDF/B-VII.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1). • The mean C/E is 1.019 for the EPRI report data, and 1.011 for the SKB data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114630
Primary Topic
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of decay heat in spent nuclear fuel using serpent 2 simulations and Clab measurements

Andreas Pautz, Alexander Vasiliev, D. McGinnes, Hakim Ferroukhi et al.
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
article

Analysis of decay heat in spent nuclear fuel using serpent 2 simulations and Clab measurements

Andreas Pautz, Alexander Vasiliev, D. McGinnes, Hakim Ferroukhi, D. Rochman, L. A. Berry, S. Portolan
article en

Abstract

This study compares measured and calculated decay heat values for spent nuclear fuel assemblies stored at Sweden’s Clab facility, an interim storage site where decay heat can be directly measured. The analysis utilizes measured values from two reports: one from the Svensk Kärnbränslehantering Aktiebolag (SKB, 2006) and another from the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI, 2024). A number of these measured values is present in both reports, possibly updated in the newer version. Burnup and decay calculations are performed using the Monte Carlo software Serpent 2 to accurately model the assemblies’ geometry and the respective reactors’ operating conditions. The impact of using two different sources of information on decay heat measurements is assessed through C/E (Calculations over Experiments) ratios for the selected fuel assemblies. The results indicate no statistical evidence that the re-evaluated estimates from the EPRI report differ significantly from the initial estimates in the SKB report. Furthermore, the study highlights that even small variations in moderator density can lead to significant changes in the final decay heat values. Finally, the study evaluates differences in C/E ratios across various fuel assembly types. Confidence intervals are estimated first at a general level, based on the reactor type, and then refined to account for specific fuel assembly characteristics. In general we found the 95% confidence interval for the C/E of a fuel assembly taken from EPRI report to range from 1.016 to 1.023, with a mean C/E of 1.019. • Comparison between measurements from Clab facility and Serpent 2 simulations. • A total of 270 measurements for EPRI report were compared to Serpent 2 simulations. • A total of 109 measurements for SKB were compared to Serpent 2 simulations. • Two different nuclear data libraries were used (ENDF/B-VII.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1). • The mean C/E is 1.019 for the EPRI report data, and 1.011 for the SKB data.

Nuclear Engineering and DesignVol. 446
Paul Scherrer Institute (CH), Axpo (Switzerland) (CH), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.