“I want to be honest…but how much can I share?”: Sustainable influencing and experiences of moral residue

Transparency is the cornerstone of social media influencing. Research has explored how influencers disclose commercial interests, yet little is known about influencers’ self-disclosure of private consumption. Building on the transparency management and moral hypocrisy literatures, this paper explores how sustainable influencers navigate moral dilemmas as they communicate about sustainability. Through interviews and analysis of media articles, we find that sustainable fashion influencers experience persistent emotional baggage, which we frame as moral residue as well as moral hypocrisy, in navigating three moral dilemmas: (anti)consumption; (non)promotion; and (non)commercialization. To reconcile this, sustainable fashion influencers engage in transparency management, choosing between strategies of confessing, concealing, and/or conning . These strategies may inadvertently lock sustainable influencers in perpetual cycles of moral residue and moral hypocrisy. In explicating the process and potential outcomes of managing transparency around moral dilemmas, we provide an intrapersonal view of moral hypocrisy and offer implications for theory and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Research
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115872
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I want to be honest…but how much can I share?”: Sustainable influencing and experiences of moral residue

Pierre McDonagh, Iain Davies, Amira Mukendi, Sarah Glozer et al.
Journal of Business Research
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

“I want to be honest…but how much can I share?”: Sustainable influencing and experiences of moral residue

Pierre McDonagh, Iain Davies, Amira Mukendi, Sarah Glozer, Anne Marie Doherty
article en

Abstract

Transparency is the cornerstone of social media influencing. Research has explored how influencers disclose commercial interests, yet little is known about influencers’ self-disclosure of private consumption. Building on the transparency management and moral hypocrisy literatures, this paper explores how sustainable influencers navigate moral dilemmas as they communicate about sustainability. Through interviews and analysis of media articles, we find that sustainable fashion influencers experience persistent emotional baggage, which we frame as moral residue as well as moral hypocrisy, in navigating three moral dilemmas: (anti)consumption; (non)promotion; and (non)commercialization. To reconcile this, sustainable fashion influencers engage in transparency management, choosing between strategies of confessing, concealing, and/or conning . These strategies may inadvertently lock sustainable influencers in perpetual cycles of moral residue and moral hypocrisy. In explicating the process and potential outcomes of managing transparency around moral dilemmas, we provide an intrapersonal view of moral hypocrisy and offer implications for theory and practice.

Journal of Business ResearchVol. 204
University of Strathclyde (GB), University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.