Effectiveness of Opioid Titration for Terminal Dyspnea in Opioid-Naïve and -Tolerant Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Terminal dyspnea is a distressing symptom in advanced cancer patients. Although opioids are standard treatment, their effectiveness may differ between opioid-naïve and -tolerant patients. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To evaluate responses to opioid titration for terminal dyspnea and assess differences in palliative care physicians' perceptions of opioid effectiveness between opioid-naïve and -tolerant patients. <b><i>Design:</i></b> A pre-planned secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> Advanced cancer patients (<i>n</i> = 108) with moderate to severe terminal dyspnea and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3-4, receiving continuous parenteral opioid infusions, were included and categorized as opioid-naïve (<i>n</i> = 48) or opioid-tolerant (<i>n</i> = 60). <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Opioid doses were titrated in four predefined levels within 48 hours, with effectiveness assessed 6 hours post-titration using the Clinician Global Impression-Improvement scale. Opioid ineffectiveness was defined as the need for continuous sedatives or death without dyspnea relief, with doses recorded as the parenteral morphine-equivalent daily dose. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean age was 72 years, and lung cancer was present in 43 patients (40%). Opioid-naïve patients showed a 100% response after 12 titrations, while opioid-tolerant patients exhibited a 68% response after 34 titrations. At death or one month after treatment, opioids were determined to be ineffective in 8.3% of opioid-naïve and 38% of opioid-tolerant patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Median doses at ineffectiveness were 15 mg (IQR = 7.5-23) and 36 mg (IQR = 14-200), respectively. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Opioid-tolerant patients showed a lower-level response and were more likely to experience ineffectiveness than opioid-naïve patients. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and improve terminal dyspnea management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10966218251400154
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Opioid Titration for Terminal Dyspnea in Opioid-Naïve and -Tolerant Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Eriko Satomi, Toshihiro Yamauchi, Satoru Miwa, Soichiro Okamoto et al.
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Effectiveness of Opioid Titration for Terminal Dyspnea in Opioid-Naïve and -Tolerant Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Eriko Satomi, Toshihiro Yamauchi, Satoru Miwa, Soichiro Okamoto, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Kozue Suzuki, David Hui, Akira Inoue, Ryo Matsunuma, Naosuke Yokomichi, Tomoo Ikari, Yoshihisa Matsumoto, Satoshi Inoue, Takashi Yamaguchi, Kengo Imai, Hiroaki Watanabe, Masanori Mori, Tatsuya Morita
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Terminal dyspnea is a distressing symptom in advanced cancer patients. Although opioids are standard treatment, their effectiveness may differ between opioid-naïve and -tolerant patients. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To evaluate responses to opioid titration for terminal dyspnea and assess differences in palliative care physicians' perceptions of opioid effectiveness between opioid-naïve and -tolerant patients. <b><i>Design:</i></b> A pre-planned secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> Advanced cancer patients (<i>n</i> = 108) with moderate to severe terminal dyspnea and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3-4, receiving continuous parenteral opioid infusions, were included and categorized as opioid-naïve (<i>n</i> = 48) or opioid-tolerant (<i>n</i> = 60). <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Opioid doses were titrated in four predefined levels within 48 hours, with effectiveness assessed 6 hours post-titration using the Clinician Global Impression-Improvement scale. Opioid ineffectiveness was defined as the need for continuous sedatives or death without dyspnea relief, with doses recorded as the parenteral morphine-equivalent daily dose. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean age was 72 years, and lung cancer was present in 43 patients (40%). Opioid-naïve patients showed a 100% response after 12 titrations, while opioid-tolerant patients exhibited a 68% response after 34 titrations. At death or one month after treatment, opioids were determined to be ineffective in 8.3% of opioid-naïve and 38% of opioid-tolerant patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Median doses at ineffectiveness were 15 mg (IQR = 7.5-23) and 36 mg (IQR = 14-200), respectively. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Opioid-tolerant patients showed a lower-level response and were more likely to experience ineffectiveness than opioid-naïve patients. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and improve terminal dyspnea management.

Journal of Palliative Medicine
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Tohoku University (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital (JP), Seirei Mikatabara General Hospital (JP), Komaki City Hospital (JP), Tokyo National Hospital (JP), NHO Kinki Chuo Chest Medical Center (JP), Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.